Edit: wanted to add that I recognize that the people working on OpenSSH know a lot more about this than I do, and I had assumed they wouldn't bother implementing this if it wasn't a good idea, so willing to accept that "proven correct" may be an overstatement or even flat-out wrong.
Actually it works perfectly and it's called a one-time pad!
I hesitate to even bring it up because it tends to poison any online discussion, but the DNC leaks were a pretty obvious one. Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt that the leaks were truly whistleblowing despite not actually revealing any illegal behavior, the way he continued to insinuate that Seth Rich was his source despite Assange still being in contact with the source after Rich's death should make it clear that Assange was not acting ethically.
>but ultimately a clear net benefit to mankind.
And this was exactly my original point. This isn't how the law works. We don't throw the good and bad on the scales of justice to see which side is heaviest. He did plenty of good things. He committed some crimes. The good things don't excuse the crimes.
Shoot, there goes the argument I was planning to deploy against Saint Peter at the Pearly Gates.
With current interest rates of around 5%, one could get the same stream of income ($2.8k/y) by just plonking $50k or so into a high-yield savings account or money market fund.