they all sound generic - monotonous - soul or individual voice
same tidbits all over:
>> Here's the game change
>> What the math says
>> What everyone doesn't know
>> the em-dashes --
for everyone who still writes in their own voice, thank you. if you generate social media slop for either linkedIn, Shitter, HN then F*k You
Do you find people respond better to your LLM-corrected posts, or is it mainly for your own comfort?
I've been thinking about this too; perhaps the authenticity (or "voice", even a poor one) should -- or will -- matter more than grammar etc.
Coworkers who hide from international hires to avoid using English are suddenly fluent in corporate American English on LinkedIn.
They even use alliteration frequently in headers! They’re not aware they’re doing it though.
I dropped into /new so that I can "foe" all the barf.
Reading opposing viewpoints is so important and is becoming a lost art in our society. I encourage you to understand and empathize with people you don't agree with. It will help all of us in the long run.
>> Emojis (:sparkles, :green_tick) at the start of every title.
>> "That's not a X, it is a Y"
>> "Why this solution works"
All visible on LinkedIn, X and GitHub.
Unfortunately, parts of how AI produced texts are structured and formulated do match my natural voice, since it follows the classic patterns of writing. That sucks.
Code: ~100% LLM
Communication: ~100% Me
Communication isn't docs, docs are increasingly defined by more steering docs which are read by both LLM and humans; but for pure human consumption (e.g. email). I type them virtually 100%, this keep every sentence my own words.