Readit News logoReadit News
ivraatiems · 13 days ago
I didn't realize "caring" meant "being exploitable" as in "working extra hard for no extra pay."

I guess I just don't care.

hazek112 · 13 days ago
Unless it's my own company I'd have to be making at least $500k to really "care".
latchkey · 13 days ago
I read through all the comments and it is amazing that nobody is mentioning the fact that the reason why this 2020 post is coming up now is because of this:

Scale recently laid off 200 full-time employees and terminated 500 contractor positions. The CEO, author of the post, went to work for Meta.

https://scale.com/blog/scale-ai-announces-next-phase-of-comp...

aleph_minus_one · 13 days ago
I agree that this information is highly interesting and relevant considering the content of the article.

On the other hand, I can easily imagine why nobody mentioned this fact befor you did: only few people read startup gossip.

latchkey · 13 days ago
> only few people read startup gossip

Numbers disagree: 485 comments, 470 points.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44268197

oceansky · 13 days ago
"How many hours were you working a week?"

Funnily enough, hearing this question is a huge red flag for me. It signals they value work hours more than quality delivery.

cosmotic · 13 days ago
I thought the same thing. The moment the article equated 5h work day to not giving a shit, they lost me.
catigula · 13 days ago
"It isn't enough for your work to make me rich. You also have to care."

We're in a weird place where we can actually read what these people think publicly.

robocat · 13 days ago
Odd that the article doesn't address the most obvious criticism: is the CEO just matching the cliche of trying to select for people that overwork for underpay?

Wanting to work hard is positively correlated with perseverance and work which inspires.

Hard working is good when it's good.

atoav · 13 days ago
A absolute rookie mistake is thinking your exhaustion-level has a linear correlation with the quality of the results. I know people who get suspicious if they haven't exhausted themselves, how can they have done a good job if they are not drained?

The truth is that the level of your craft has probably the biggest impact. A beginner can tear themselves apart with stressfull allnighters while doing a job and deliver the result a seasoned pro would have delivered in an afternoon.

And if all your employees are doing is stressfull allnighters and damage control they have no time to learn how to do properly and fast. But I get it, the goal is to extract money from their labour, not be their friends or produce quality products.

sam_lowry_ · 13 days ago
I actually do care. I am also emotionally involved. Bad code makes me feel bad, I am ecstatic about good code.

I am deeply saddened when I see people making the same mistakes over and over again.

This attitude negatively impacted my career on more than one occasion.

I am now doing a relatively low-pay work for the public services. My job is cleaning the Augean stables of decades-old Java code, but I feel better than shitting crappy code for the unicorn that none needs in the industry that should not exist.

Paracompact · 13 days ago
> In no world can you be working 5 hours a day and be giving a shit.

"Four hours of creative work a day is about the limit for a mathematician." ~~ Henri Poincaré.

https://nesslabs.com/how-much-work-is-enough-work

bayindirh · 12 days ago
During my Ph.D., I worked very intensely with the help of a Pomodoro timer. After 4 to 5 hours of productive work (8-10 pomodoros), my brain just shut down, but I did a ton of work during that time.

Human body has its real limits. Respecting your body is essential for living a healthy life.

misterdee · 12 days ago
This is me too. But if I add a 20-30 min powernap and some coffee, I can get another 4 pomodoros in.
forty · 13 days ago
Then maybe build a cooperative, where all employees are effectively co-owning the company? Then you can expect everyone to care as much as you do. Otherwise it doesn't seem to be a fair thing to expect.