The only hypothesis that makes sense to me is that there is something very dangerous on the loose that is being searched for, such as nuclear material. The highest authorities don't want to cause panic so they are executing a search this way.
EDIT: Actually there were statements that didn't leave room for semantic games:
“The Bureau is actively investigating the situation you mentioned, the unexplained sighting of drone activity over that part of New Jersey, including in proximity to sensitive sites and areas of concern. We do not attribute that to an individual or a group yet."
If they are Department of Energy, that's consistent with them not being US Military. For example, DoE is publicly known to have radiation detection helicopters - See Aerial Measuring System (AMS) and Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST)
Highly doubt someone in military PR is doing the 4d chess involved with making this quote while also being in the search grid and not informed:
"While no direct threats to the installation have been identified, we can confirm multiple instances of unidentified drones entering the airspace above Naval Weapons Station Earle," Bill Addison, public affairs officer for the naval station, said in a statement to ABC News.
They’d just say nothing was seen, or it was normal flight ops, or make up a training mission.
The military doesn’t re-enforce the reason for public panic or admit they aren’t omnipotent unless they really don’t know.
Gas mileage, safety, noise, cost, on top of the fact they already have tons of long range single prop drones kitted out with surveillance gear. Almost all of the videos look like predator style drones flying search grids. Maybe they have some large quadcopter drones in the air but I haven’t seen a single photo or video of anything that looks like one.
The military has all sorts of cool techniques to find things without using drones, which makes me wonder if it's a private party conducting a search. Or is this in order to make it deniable for the military - not _looking_ like a military op
I feel like myself and a few others, some cash, some materials, a bit of legal immunity, could easily have a working solution to capture a few of these for analysis.
Hilariously, that was one of the ideas I had... among others: everything from shotguns (when loaded with birdshot and fired upwards, the shot falls back to earth harmlessly), to FPV chase pilots, long endurance ISR and tracking to origin, or even getting the right people to the table that have faster drones.
All of these things are pretty simple, I'm sure with the right people in the room even better ideas would emerge.
Here's a video by Mick West, who's an expert in analyzing things people see in the sky, that does a great job of explaining what's happening and making it seem obvious in retrospect. It's short (< 4 minutes) and if we could figure out a way to make it required viewing for media that would help a lot.
Readit News
I guess they could be playing semantic games. Could be defense contractor owned and operated as opposed to directly military controlled.
In any case, if they know what they are they are lying. Either directly or by omission. Not that either would be unusual.
[1]: https://techcrunch.com/2024/12/11/pentagon-says-mystery-dron...
EDIT: Actually there were statements that didn't leave room for semantic games:
“The Bureau is actively investigating the situation you mentioned, the unexplained sighting of drone activity over that part of New Jersey, including in proximity to sensitive sites and areas of concern. We do not attribute that to an individual or a group yet."
https://homeland.house.gov/2024/12/12/unexplained-sighting-d...
"While no direct threats to the installation have been identified, we can confirm multiple instances of unidentified drones entering the airspace above Naval Weapons Station Earle," Bill Addison, public affairs officer for the naval station, said in a statement to ABC News.
They’d just say nothing was seen, or it was normal flight ops, or make up a training mission.
The military doesn’t re-enforce the reason for public panic or admit they aren’t omnipotent unless they really don’t know.
CEO of a drone manufacturer seems to agree with your hypothesis
Deleted Comment
I don’t now anything about such scans but that was my immediate rebuttal.
Like you, though, at least I find this explanation plausible.
I’m calling it - this is going down as the largest case of mass hysteria in recorded history.
All of these things are pretty simple, I'm sure with the right people in the room even better ideas would emerge.
- with bright lights,
- flying over the same populated areas
- at the same time each night.
Not fake at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK4HFxzsjgo
tldr: People aren't seeing drones. It's collective delusion.
Dead Comment