Readit News logoReadit News
whalesalad · a year ago
I was heavily involved with Wordpress from about 2006 to 2012. I made it do things it was never designed to do before a lot of plugins like this existed. It was garbage then and it’s still garbage now. I stopped using it primarily because I saw what a cluster fuck the internals were and how out of control the plugin upsell ecosystem became. There were inklings of this behavior from the supreme leader too, like believing theme sales were antithetical to the entire point of WP. So I jumped ship with a real bad taste in my mouth and never looked back. I’ve tried it a handful of times over the year and it still looks like the same turd with a few more layers of polish. Still won’t scale out of the box without caching plugins.

The irony of this entire situation is Matt didn’t even make Wordpress. It was forked from a blogging engine called b2. How’s that expression go? You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

lightningspirit · a year ago
Actually, when someone forks a project creates a new repo. This is not the case, the plugin was indeed a take over instead.
yard2010 · a year ago
// (so much for) code is poetry
cranium · a year ago
What an ego trip... now I'll definitely stop considering WordPress, even if it perfectly fills the use-case (mine or client's).

I know it was frustrating for Automattic to see WPEngine as a leecher, but to be this hostile and volatile does not inspire confidence. What if you had a WP instance hosted by Automattic and said something the leadership does not approve? Will you get banned with no way of recovering your website? (Ghost had a similar story.)

navigate8310 · a year ago
Slightly tangential, ACF support forum https://wordpress.org/support/topic/if-this-is-the-fork-wher... had many users calling out Matt regarding this unethical takeover; all comments are now purged and thread locked.
kcrwfrd_ · a year ago
What’s the story with Ghost?
ookblah · a year ago
he must be having a legit mental breakdown. i do not understand any of these decisions done so haphazardly with no regard to users or their current situation, even if that was the direction they were moving. basically, telegraphing that he will personally go out and fuck up your day if you cross him. pettiness to the nth degree right here.
Analemma_ · a year ago
At first we were saying it as a joke, but I am increasingly seriously wondering just how many famous people in the Valley are in various stages of stimulant psychosis, considering how widespread the joking-not-joking talk is about liberally using Adderall etc. to maximize "the grind".
purple-leafy · a year ago
Don’t casually suggest “mental breakdown” for people and situations you do not know or have first party insight to.

First, blaming things on “mental breakdowns” is incredibly lazy and shallow and belittles the struggle that people with mental illness have.

Did you ever stop to think that maybe this guy is just greedy, or an incompetent CEO?

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe · a year ago
Well, an essential part of psychiatric diagnosis is often to notice the presence of a noticeable before/after change. Psychosis, mania, are valid hypothesis that would make a CEO take surprising decision.

I don't see how that belittles the struggle of patients. Having and company and being bipolar is far from life on easy mode.

Greed and incompetence are also valid hypothesis, although don't necessarily need an abrupt change in behavior.

ookblah · a year ago
he could be all of them? i'm basing this off the fact that he was able to run and build it up to what it is today, then suddenly going off the rails. more of me grasping at an explanation than a declaration of truth heh.
baggy_trough · a year ago
Yes but I think it’s more likely he is having a mental breakdown.
gwerbret · a year ago
Aside: each and every post about Wordpress on HN over the past couple of days has been downweighted basically to oblivion (I expect this one to vanish from anywhere near the front page very soon). Is there a reason for this? The topic is rapidly evolving and is relevant to the HN community.
awb · a year ago
Check out “how are stories ranked” in the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

Overheated discussions get demoted. I think the idea is that the comments should support discussion of the content, but not usurp it.

suzzer99 · a year ago
> How are stories ranked?

> The basic algorithm divides points by a power of the time since a story was submitted. Comments in threads are ranked the same way.

> Other factors affecting rank include user flags, anti-abuse software, software which demotes overheated discussions, account or site weighting, and moderator action.

It could also be moderator action.

My most viral submission suddenly dropped from the top story to page 8, despite having far more points than anything else on that page, and only being a few hours old. I suspect this happened because it was a negative post about Amazon. The comments were not overheated. Most posters agreed with my sentiment.

ChrisArchitect · a year ago
Multiple submissions seen by many and lots of discussion. Stuff moves fast.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41821336

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41821400

And that's just on this development. Each stage of this crazy story has had plenty of views and discussion here.

akrotkov · a year ago
I believe the comment-to-upvote ratio is triggering an automated down-weighing on most of them.
yellow_lead · a year ago
When the comment to upvote ratio is too high, posts are down weighted to prevent flamewars, apparently.
hyperbrainer · a year ago
Do note that there is barely any comments on any. So, maybe that is a factor.
ars · a year ago
There's no such thing as downvoting a post on HN, only a comment.

There's flagging a post, but that would show up next to the post - do you have any examples?

gwerbret · a year ago
Moderators can downweight posts to drop their rankings. Here are 3 examples:

https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=41791369

https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=41815614

https://news.social-protocols.org/stats?id=41821336

Note the orange line indicating rank, which in every case shows a very sudden and precipitous drop in the rank of each post.

Zak · a year ago
Moderators can reduce the position of a post on the front page.
binary_slinger · a year ago
> If you use WordPress for a living, I recommend strongly that you consider changing platforms.

I initially thought this as well. There are alternatives but unless those alternatives are 100% API compatible with WP plugins and themes nothing is going to happen. Wordpress users and devs will continue to use WP. business as usual. Matt knows this.

cwalv · a year ago
I don't know much about WordPress, but it's pretty amazing to me how much staying power it's had. It seemed crusty, bloated and not long for this world 10 years ago to me.
lightningspirit · a year ago
Matt also knows that the messy WordPress API (both actions and filters) is difficult to integrate into a well-architected software project as a plug-and-play mechanism.
gnabgib · a year ago
Ongoing discussion (289 points, 8 hours ago, 125 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41821400
perihelions · a year ago
And another one

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41821336 ("Secure Custom Fields by WordPress.org (wordpress.org)"; 11 hours ago, 153 comments)

butterfly42069 · a year ago
Every day that goes by I'm more satisfied with my decision a week a go to migrate everything I have/am building off of WordPress.

Matt, if you read this...

:(

input_sh · a year ago
From WordPress to what?
butterfly42069 · a year ago
Only a week in, but at the moment I'm building out things with HUGO and experiments are going very well.

Decided to seek out the absolute antithesis of WordPress after this experience, and don't wish to be dependent on peoples whims so much anymore.

I recognise the limitations of SSGs, but I think these are overcomeable, and the benefits (Speed, CI) seem massive.

I am open to hearing other suggestions people may have though.