Readit News logoReadit News
zcesur · a year ago
Creator of Algora here, thanks for sharing! This was a pleasant surprise :) I posted about our Elixir bounties yesterday on Reddit, and I was not expecting to see it on HN front page the next day.

I've been building this since early this year. Over the past few months, developers like Daniel Roe (Nuxt.com maintainer), Chris Griffing, Andras Bacsai (Coolify.io maintainer) have been livestreaming with Algora their coding sessions, office hours, product launches, podcasts, and more.

Algora TV supports free multistreaming to Twitch, X, YouTube, custom RTMPs [1] and aggregates live comments from these platforms.

I chose to build Algora in Elixir because of a few reasons: 1) Productivity gains from using Phoenix LiveView are unparalleled as a solo developer 2) OTP is super helpful for handling complex streaming pipelines. Things like multistreaming, mirroring chat messages, capturing thumbnails etc. can fail at any time, and OTP makes it easier to build fault-tolerant processes 3) BEAM clustering allows distributing the system across multiple nodes with ease, which helps reduce latency between streamers and viewers.

As the sole maintainer of the project, I'd love to get your help with improving Algora! If you're up for contributing, I've put up a bunch of bounties [2] to prioritize some issues.

In any case, I'd love to hear from you if you have any feedback or questions!

[1]: https://algora.tv/docs/streaming/multicast

[2]: https://algora.io/org/algora/bounties

marshray · a year ago
Since you asked for feedback, the first two things I noticed were:

1. The license.

2. On the home page, everyone had the X logo by their name.

For me, personally, these things combined were enough to decide to not bookmark it.

spartanatreyu · a year ago
Personally X logos are a red flag for me.

I either think they're:

1. Old accounts that haven't been updated in a long time

2. Bots or fake and generated accounts

3. Conspiracy nuts

lakomen · a year ago
Documentation sucks. It doesn't explain what it is. Why open source Twitch? Introduction doesn't explain anything. Is it a Twitch competitor? Is it a restream competitor? ... annoying
prmoustache · a year ago
The dependency on github is giving me pause. I think it is nice to give the option for developpers to connect with github, but local accounts should always be a possibility imho.

Also it is not clear from the readme if Tigris is a requirement or if any S3 API compatible storage can be used. It doesn't seem to be the case according to the environment variables given so I find it strange that Tigris is even mentionned.

zcesur · a year ago
Duly noted, we're probably going to add local accounts at some point. For the time being, limiting to GitHub auth has been really helpful to keep the platform focused on developers and combat spam.

Any S3-compatible storage should work fine! That being said it would require a lot more work to set it up as you also need to worry about caching, replication, distribution etc. For a livestreaming platform it's super important to ensure livestreams are available globally to minimize latency for viewers.

Tigris has all of this built-in, so it already behaves like a CDN. It's what we use on https://algora.tv and we wanted to make getting started as easy as possible for our contributors and anyone who's looking to self-host.

prmoustache · a year ago
Makes sense, thank you.
pzmarzly · a year ago
Per Tigris Pricing[0]:

> While other cloud providers tax you for each GB of data transferred, we don't. At Tigris, we don't charge for regional data transfer, region-to-region data transfer, or data transfer out to the internet (egress) in the majority of use cases. However, if your bandwidth requirements are extraordinary, please reach out to us at sales@tigrisdata.com to discuss your requirements.

I wonder if a successful live video platform would count as extraordinary usage, I would assume so.

[0] https://www.tigrisdata.com/docs/pricing/

ovaistariq · a year ago
Tigris CEO and co-founder here. Unless it is in tens of PB range we don’t count it as extraordinary. And even then the goal is not to tax for bandwidth.
PhilippGille · a year ago
They seem to have partnered in the past, which sounds like Tigris is on board with Algora's usage:

> Every time Tigris partnered with Algora for live media & distribution we saw more developers try Tigris and experienced increased inbound from prospective customers.

(from a testimonial by Tigris' CEO on https://tv.algora.io/partner)

stanleykm · a year ago
For now they havent had anyone build a successful livestreaming site but they have had some punters try so theyre happy to take the money.
solarkraft · a year ago
Please stop directly referring to brands in your descriptions. This is not Twitch. Maybe it’s like Twitch, but it is not Twitch.

Not only is it confusing, it also gets you into hot water legally.

jascha_eng · a year ago
This isn't even close to twitch right? It's just a middle layer to add ads to the stream without it being adblockable.
zcesur · a year ago
You stream from your OBS directly to Algora, just like Twitch. And we let you multistream to YouTube, X, Twitch just like Restream.

The ads is a new feature, the cool thing is they don't interrupt the stream and show across all platforms.

drpossum · a year ago
Titling this as "open source Twitch" makes me think this is somehow related to twitch. Why not just say "open source streaming platform for developers"?
croes · a year ago
>open source streaming platform

Like Netflix?

Naming the comparable known service sets the expectations straight.

But I wouldn't just it in the title for IP reasons.

jsnell · a year ago
"Livestreaming" is an established term for this kind of service that also naturally sets the right expectations.
drpossum · a year ago
No, it doesn't. There's an important difference between wording like open "source twitch" and "open source twitch-like"
prmoustache · a year ago
The actual github repo has a different title: The interactive livestreaming & video sharing service for developers.
CYR1X · a year ago
What makes it specifically for developers? Why couldn't gamers use this?
everforward · a year ago
Might just be the level of support they’re interested in offering.

I’ve definitely used similar language as a kinder way to say “I have no interest in maintaining this to a degree where I think Joe Schmoe can use it, and I don’t want support tickets from people who can’t install Postgres on their own”.

Looking at the install instructions, it seems like something where you’d need to be familiar with Postgres, object storage, enough Linux to install dependencies, and enough networking to be able to do at least a cursory check for whether a stuttering or delayed stream was due to your network, the servers network, Tigris or something else entirely. That’s pretty much just gonna be IT folks

giancarlostoro · a year ago
I was wondering the same, maybe the goal is more features specific to gamers? But I could see this being useful to more than just programmer streamers.
prmoustache · a year ago
I don't think they couldn't but maybe they aren't targetting that on purpose for various reasons.
pzmarzly · a year ago
The link points to the code, but for me the more interesting part is the public instance. https://tv.algora.io/
dindresto · a year ago
In the fediverse, owncast is an established selfhosted solution for livestreams with chat: https://owncast.online/
KronisLV · a year ago
Didn’t PeerTube also have some streaming functionality?

https://docs.joinpeertube.org/use/create-upload-video#publis...

I’ve used it for hosting videos only so far, but it’s a lovely piece of software.

Deleted Comment

jonhohle · a year ago
I’ve recently been streaming decompilation on Twitch[0]. I find the intersection of gaming and tech enthusiasts nice (it’s pretty basic educational decomp and describing the mechanics of the game).

Ultimately where are people going to watch and discover? Glad to see interest in dev streaming.

0 - https://m.twitch.tv/madeupofwires/home