Readit News logoReadit News
DidYaWipe · a year ago
Who introduces this reviled junk NOW, after years of mockery, and on a media player? Anyone who actually wants this (or doesn't care) already has it on his TV, making its addition to individual sources stupid and redundant.
syntheticnature · a year ago
Reading between the lines slightly, it sounds like this affects TVs running Roku software for inbuilt "smarts" rather than the media players themselves. Still not great, of course.
ethbr1 · a year ago
Anyone who allows their TV to connect to the internet deserves what they get.
ethbr1 · a year ago
ChrisArchitect · a year ago
And Verge coverage submitted earlier....by OP?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40875351

23B1 · a year ago
From the article: "[Maybe] Roku is operating with such large numbers these days that every decision is a fly-by-wire corporate abstraction far from the bare metal of the user experience. This means upgrades and features gain unstoppable internal force and the only thing that can stop them is the immovable object of financial results months or years later."

This is the most optimized feedback loop: one without a user. See all the major tech companies for addt'l examples, from AMZN to X.

SoftTalker · a year ago
I like the other explanation: Roku is basically an appliance company with no internal culture of culture, so it just never came up and now they're dealing with all this stuff they didn't realize had anything to do with what they sold.

They could be selling video streaming, or video poker. They don't care, as long as they have subscribers.

itronitron · a year ago
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Roku is managed by an AI.
23B1 · a year ago
What I don't understand is why cinephiles would be streaming through a Roku anyway. Shouldn't they be downloading 18K TURBO-HD straight from the Academy's server?
red-iron-pine · a year ago
> They could be selling video streaming, or video poker. They don't care, as long as they have subscribers.

first time dealing with capitalism, eh?

add-sub-mul-div · a year ago
I used to make the joke, "Roku is the worst thing to happen to TVs since motion smoothing." Now it needs a rewrite.
itronitron · a year ago
I bought a Roku years ago, when Hulu was a viable alternative to Netflix, and was very surprised to discover that we had access to fewer shows on Hulu after subscribing to Hulu (and paying for the privilege) through Roku. Simply put, if you were just watching Hulu anonymously for free then you had access to more shows than if you were paying for Hulu through Roku.

Probably the fastest product return I have ever made.

navjack27 · a year ago
I haven't noticed anything on my TCL with built-in Roku that I use as my computer display. But that's because I have game mode on all the time and I just checked it by disabling game mode and I'm pretty sure at least mine's not affected.

55R615 model

breput · a year ago
I wonder if this is only enabled for certain content?

I also have a TCL TV and would definitely notice this effect, and I typically use Movie picture mode so you'd expect it would be triggered, but doesn't seem to be present on YouTube or other streaming sources.

Wistar · a year ago
My 75” TCL running Roku seems to be unaffected. Thank goodness. I despise that (field rate) soap opera look.
db48x · a year ago
If you don’t control the software, someone else does.

Deleted Comment

bastien2 · a year ago
The latest in a long line of utterly stupid decisions by Roku demonstrating their lack of competency.

Why anyone willingly choses Roku anymore is beyond me.

dventimihasura · a year ago
Perhaps The New York Times recommending it has something to do with it:

https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-media-stream...