Readit News logoReadit News
dave4420 · 2 years ago
…250 million years from now.

Valid research, but this is click bait reporting.

cbsmith · 2 years ago
Yeah, I feel dirty for clicking on the link.
tivert · 2 years ago
I find this website to be highly credible. The world's most reliable reporting comes from Lad Bible, which most high prestigious news organizations tend to follow.

It's interesting that this cited the "continentality effect" as a reason for a mass extinction. Did previous subcontinents have a similar extinction effect, or would there still be more habitable environments at the margins?

gmuslera · 2 years ago
In 250 million years, whatever is around by then, if things are left alone. Hominids has been around 5M years, mankind 200k years, civilization 10-20k years, and global civilization less than 200 years.

And in the last 100 years we changed enough the planet to start changing it into an hostile environment for mankind and civilization. I don't know if we will be around in 100 years and in what conditions, because what we are doing with climate and the irresponsible way that we handle the power we achieved (nuclear, technology, internet, etc) may be a threat for us. They may as well warn us about the dangers of the Sun turning into a red giant for what it will affect mankind.

threeboy · 2 years ago
250 million years? That's not a study that's scifi.

Deleted Comment

Ekaros · 2 years ago
So nothing we do for climate change will prevent this? Time to stop caring if we will die anyway...
gs17 · 2 years ago
> The only silver lining is that the event is 250 million years away, per the prediction.

This is not in any way about modern climate change.

zb3 · 2 years ago
You will be downvoted because others have financial interest in pushing this "emission reduction" agenda. But ultimately those people will realize that properly orchestrating their death was a much better option, but then it will be too late
V__ · 2 years ago
You will be downvoted because others have financial interest in pushing this "asbestos reduction" agenda. But ultimately those people will realize that properly orchestrating their death was a much better option, but then it will be too late
zb3 · 2 years ago
It's better to do a voluntary extinction, because the involuntary one will inevitably happen and it'll be absolutely brutal, don't expect anything else
readthenotes1 · 2 years ago
Cockroaches first

Deleted Comment