I'm the founder of a seed-stage startup and need to expand the team (currently 5 people) — I'm considering hiring interns for growth, product, operations, and sales.
For those who have hired interns before (students / fresh grads), how do they compare to full-time hires, both in terms of output and time to productivity?
Do they produce quality work (in their first few months), or are they mostly for a talent pipeline? How much autonomy can I give them and how hands on do I have to be with onboarding / continuous coaching?
Cheers all for the thoughts :)
It seems that what you needs is a team of fully trained, highly educated robots.
I managed the interships and volunteers for a UK national charity.
How do students and trainees compare to full time staff? Clearly they are students and trainees usually with no onsite experience, so in my experince many years behind your full time staff experience.
Do they produce quality work in the first few months? Depends on the intern and whether or not you set them up to fail and what the meaning of quality work means.
Interns only have an academic experience of their chosen field not an onsite profit driven or anxiety provoking environment.
It takes time for interns to blossom
So far I have not seen interns expected to do real, important work.
That being said, I'm in the EU, so things might be different where you are located.
With all these being said, hiring interns to get them ready to work for you is a good idea. That's what happened to me, and what I do right now. While we are giving students an opportunity to involve in a real company which benefits them, we also direct them into learning our tech stack and conventions, which might benefit us in the future. Your resources (money and time) is used like a future investment in this case