Readit News logoReadit News
franga2000 · 2 years ago
I don't want to start a "who did it first" because I don't know for sure, but given when this was posted, it feels wrong not to mention Tito Ferradans [0][1] at all. From what I can tell, he is the one who really popularised this mod and if you're interested in getting that anamorphic look on a (relative) budget, his channel is full of great tips.

[0] https://www.tferradans.com/ [1] https://youtube.com/c/AnamorphicOnABudget

l33tbro · 2 years ago
I modded a vintage Leica Summicron about 10 years ago using some metal a colleague machined to try the effect mentioned in the article. Did it have anamorphic bokeh? Sure. But it never gave me the feel of anamorphic, as the look is all in the desqueeze. Since it sat in between weirdo spherical and anamorphic, I just never found much use for it.
gtroja · 2 years ago
Yeah, my results doesn't feel anamorphic as well :(
baz00 · 2 years ago
To be fair we were doing this in the 80s with crappy M42 lenses and slightly less scientific method. Pentax 50mm one that came with your GDR clunker could be pushed pretty hard if you were on a budget.

The main reason for this though was to make the bokeh look like it was from a more expensive lens.

photoGrant · 2 years ago
Adding shaped apertures for custom bokeh does not an anamorphic make. Nor is Tito the first to discover such a basic and old technique
gtroja · 2 years ago
Checkout my results![1]

I've used this technique sometime ago, with an minolta srt-101. The lens it came with (55mm f1.8) had the elements screwable by hand, making the mod easy.

[1]https://troialog.tumblr.com/

gtroja · 2 years ago
the most noticeable I made I think was this one

https://64.media.tumblr.com/c4a110c4bf7013f082e81b3561bf6791...

_spduchamp · 2 years ago
That is an excellent example of the cinematic effect.
JKCalhoun · 2 years ago
Very nice photos. As a friend said, "There's something about film...."

Stay young.

thih9 · 2 years ago
Here’s a ready to buy version of the mod and the product page includes before and after comparison pictures: https://www.vid-atlantic.com/products/cinemorph
actionfromafar · 2 years ago
That product is the real deal - actual anamorphic lens, not the same as the bokeh mod.

Edit: I mixed this up with the iPhone 14 lens attachment. (Which is the real thing.)

mackman · 2 years ago
“ Anamorphic lens looks, without using an Anamorphic lens. Also known as Anamorfake or Anamorfaux!”
voltaireodactyl · 2 years ago
This is a really smart idea beautifully implemented so it can offer a great deal of practical use. Awesome post.
actionfromafar · 2 years ago
It will look similar to an anamorphic lens, but not exactly like it. The lens flares will be different for instance, and the color fringing, too. But it's pretty close to the real thing.
nyanpasu64 · 2 years ago
Not sure why you'd want an oval aperture on a lens... but if you wanted the thinnest possible light blocking area while maintaining material strength, could you make a thicker print which tapers down to a thin opening at the edges of the aperture?
thih9 · 2 years ago
> Not sure why you'd want an oval aperture on a lens...

The article says: “to produce the type of anamorphic boke you can see in the movies”.

See also: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anamorphic_format

JKCalhoun · 2 years ago
Anamorphic lenses used in cinema compressed the light horizontally to squeeze a wider aspect ratio onto a narrower strip of film.

It's funny that we chase what amounts to an (unfortunate?) artifact that a normally round aperture becomes oval.

An actual anamorphic lens on a 35mm camera body would be interesting as you would actually also get the wider aspect ratio. I imagine they either do not exist or that they would be prohibitively expensive — thus this "hack" (and I use the term with fondness).

Edit: I see there are anamorphic lenses in the $600 to $1200 or so range on Amazon. Kind of annoying I suppose to have to stretch everything in post.

anArbitraryOne · 2 years ago
That is a funny spelling mistake
yetihehe · 2 years ago
Yes, you could, but, from article:

> Also, I have to say that I didn’t notice a significant sharpness difference between 0.1mm and 2mm disks. I usually aim for a thickness of around 0.33mm (or 2/3 printing layers) This will produce plastic disks that are firm, thin, and a bit flexible.

imtringued · 2 years ago
Oval faces are considered more attractive.
esafak · 2 years ago
Nice, but when can we do this in our phones?!
thih9 · 2 years ago
Since regular bokeh on smartphones is usually emulated (portrait mode), if you want comparable amount of anamorphic bokeh then software is the way to go too.

Searching for anamorphic bokeh in an app store returns some results.

orixilus · 2 years ago
actionfromafar · 2 years ago
This is "better" than the mod, this is a real anamorphic lens.
imtringued · 2 years ago
And then people complain about how ugly they are compared to the people in movies, YouTube and other social media. The answer is that it's all fake.
Mashimo · 2 years ago
How does that relate to the topic?
chmod775 · 2 years ago
Going by their otherwise good comment history, I'd guess they're not in top form right now.

I've posted worse comments lying in bed tired, half-dead, and down with a cold.