:)
Readit NewsDeleted Comment
Dead Comment
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
If they actually want it to work as intelligently as possible, they'll begin taking these complaints into consideration and building in a wisdom curating feature where people can contribute.
This much is obvious, but they seem to be satisfied with theory over practicality.
Anyway I'm just ranting b/c they haven't paid me.
How about an off the wall algorithm to estimate how much each scraped input turns out to influence the bigger picture, as a way to work towards satisfying the copyright question.
Then who in this black box private company is the Oracle of infinite wisdom and truth!? Who are you putting in charge? Can I get a vote?
Dead Comment
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
Its not really a question about want, its a question about facts. Their actions will make a significant mark on the future. So far it seems like they are trying to promote positive changes such as inclusion and equality. Which is far far far fucking really infinitely far better than trying to promote exclusion and inequality
If it's a question of facts, why are you allowing blind assumptions to lead your opinion? Do you have sources and evidence for their agenda that matches your beliefs?
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
You're on a thread about how people are lambasting big money AI for being garbage, and producing inferior results to OSS tools you can run on consumer GPUS, tell me again how unbeatable google/other big tech players are.
I've been part of the advertising and marketing world for a lot of these companies for a decade plus, I've helped them sell bullshit. I've also been at the start of the AI journey, I've downloaded and checked local models of all promises and variances.
To say they're better than the compute that OpenAI or Google are throwing at the problem is just plain wrong.
I left the ad industry the moment I realised my skills and talents are better used informing people than lying to them.
This thread is not at all comparing the ethical issues of AI with local anything. You're conflating your solution with another problem.
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
Compute lets you fuck up a lot when trying to build a model, but you need data to do anything worth fucking up in the first place, and if you have 20% of the compute but you fuck up 1/5th as much you're doing fine.
Meta/OpenAI/Google can fuck up a lot because of all their compute, but ultimately we learn from that as the scientists doing the research at those companies would instantly bail if they couldn't publish papers on their techniques to show how clever they are.
I never said each of these exist in a vacuum. It is the collation of all that is the danger. This isn't democratic. This is companies now toying with governmental ideologies.
photoGrant commented on AI behavior guardrails should be public twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack... · Posted by u/sotasota
The ridiculous degree of PC alignment of corporate models is the thing that's going to let open source win. Few people use bing/dall-e, but if OpenAI had made dall-e more available and hadn't put ridiculous guardrails on it, stable diffusion would be a footnote at this point. Instead, dall-e is a joke and people who make art use stable diffusion, with casuals who just want some pretty looking pictures using midjourney.
No, ignoring laws and stealing data to increase your Castle's MOAT is the win. Compute isn't an open source solvable problem. I can't DirtyPCB's an A100
Making the argument open source is the answer is an agenda of making your competition spin wheels.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.