> Parts are, but not really. And I get it, AI is a controversial topic - so here's my disclaimer:
> First off - all written content on softwine is created by me. Some is aided by LLM technologies, but only with the highest level of skepticism, creative intent, and editing.
> Some is aided by LLM technologies, but only with the highest level of skepticism, creative intent, and editing.
I just watched Adam Savage on YT giving advice to youtubers. He said if you get bored editing a segment, but think your audience will appreciate it, you're wrong and you should cut it out.
I think the same is true for AI. If you think your audience will appreciate some AI rambling, but you don't, you're probably mistaken.
The enshittification of online discussion and content starts with the same morons who thought it was a good idea to speak into a megaphone when they had nothing interesting to say to hear the sound of their own voice now being capable of doing so with an AI writing their uselessness to be spoken into the megaphone.
Kind of an even worse version of this comment I'm writing right now.
This article is not - unfortunately just the writing style of an amateur blogger who always paid more attention in university science than in writing courses haha
I think the question ought to be why is your belief on the matter not the result of propaganda in the reverse direction? When you believe something that the overwhelming majority of experts disagree with then it seems it’s much more likely you are the victim of propaganda.
If 97% of the world’s oncologists say you have cancer then it’s likely you have cancer. Believing otherwise is deranged.
One doesn't have to fundamentally disagree with the existence of an issue like climate change in order to notice it warping into mass hysteria. Having lived through several such episodes I've given up convincing people that it is, in fact, mass hysteria, since people who don't see it right away never admit it until it winds down. I just hope we don't kill too many people with the "degrowth" idiocy which is fueled by flimsy doomerist predictions that are only loosely based on legitimate science but mostly pushed by entities with political and/or financial interests.
Yea, those 100F degree temps down in the southern hemisphere this winter (now for them) are a complete fluke, completely not correlated with anything else.
Heh, this reminds me of a family member I was talking to recently. "We break high temperature records all the time, that is totally normal".
And then those same dumb family members will talk about how when they were kids, the snow would reach the roof of houses. They conspicuously ignore that it hasn't done so in decades.
Readit News
From their about us:
> is this an AI-generated site?
> Parts are, but not really. And I get it, AI is a controversial topic - so here's my disclaimer:
> First off - all written content on softwine is created by me. Some is aided by LLM technologies, but only with the highest level of skepticism, creative intent, and editing.
I just watched Adam Savage on YT giving advice to youtubers. He said if you get bored editing a segment, but think your audience will appreciate it, you're wrong and you should cut it out.
I think the same is true for AI. If you think your audience will appreciate some AI rambling, but you don't, you're probably mistaken.
Kind of an even worse version of this comment I'm writing right now.
Dead Comment
Dead Comment
If 97% of the world’s oncologists say you have cancer then it’s likely you have cancer. Believing otherwise is deranged.
Heh, this reminds me of a family member I was talking to recently. "We break high temperature records all the time, that is totally normal".