Readit News logoReadit News
tayo42 · 3 years ago
IDK what the motivation is here for Iran, but I think humans blew it with pets. We have non native cats destroying sensitive ecosystems, i was just reading about rabies outbreaks in stray dog populations. Theres over population of these pets in general so we kill them. the abusive breeds that exist. If people really cared about taking care of animals we wouldn't have breeders making pure animals for people to have as status symbols. Then people just dump their pets when they get bored of them. Dont bother training them or taking care of them properly.I could go on with the issues pets cause.

theres to many terrible owners and issues pets cause, we really should have some control over these animals. its wild out there.

goethes_kind · 3 years ago
Without making value judgements, I agree with you. There are definitely a lot of costs associated with owning pets.
Ekaros · 3 years ago
Also massive environmental impact. We really should start thinking of banning some of them to combat climate change.
redeeman · 3 years ago
how about simply punishing(severely) those who cannot treat animals properly?
tayo42 · 3 years ago
Which one of my examples is treating the pet improperly?
colpabar · 3 years ago
you could move to iran :^)
tayo42 · 3 years ago
why? so we can continue to ignore the externalities of having little fluffy things around? the comment and observation makes you uncomfortable? please tell me why bulldogs should be allowed to exist. its insane what we allow to happen to animals
zvmaz · 3 years ago
> Symbols of 'Westernisation'

This a widely used rhetoric used by islamists, and "post-colonialists" in my country (Algeria). No amount of philosophical sophistication will defeat this intellectual tool of terror.

_fat_santa · 3 years ago
It's such a bullshit excuse, but TBH the real reason is: "we need to show you that we the government still have ultimate power over you, so let us implement this harsh rule that serves no purpose but to show you who is boss".
cscurmudgeon · 3 years ago
The country is Iran. Sad to see BBC resorting to clickbait.
throwaway123x2 · 3 years ago
The BBC has been rabidly anti-Iran since like 2003, when I first started reading it.
lynguist · 3 years ago
Clickbait means hiding the content of the article from its title.

The title without clickbait would read: In Iran, having a pet could soon land you in jail (bbc.com)

Deleted Comment

dragonwriter · 3 years ago
Like, doesn't the headline refer to every country (and without the “soon”, too)? Sure, which pets are problematic is a cultural variable that differs from country to country and within countries over time, but...
helge9210 · 3 years ago
Israel has a law proposed (by religious parties) to tax dogs $2500 annually.

Edit: emphasis

Sin2x · 3 years ago
Dog owners probably %)
kmlx · 3 years ago
if it’s actually dogs, then they should get a job, pay taxes etc etc
helge9210 · 3 years ago
Of course.
mynameishere · 3 years ago
Sure, dogs drool (says so right in the Koran) but I thought the prophet liked cats.
INTPenis · 3 years ago
The prophet drooled too, when he had his epileptic fits that were thought to be communications with angels.
bm3719 · 3 years ago
The Messenger of Allah may have also been doing the same when he entered 9 year old Aisha's tent to consummate their marriage.
LadyCailin · 3 years ago
What an absolutely horrific and senseless law.
4ad · 3 years ago
Sadly, as far as iranian horrific and senseless laws, I think this is pretty mild. I am more concerned about women and dissidents.
LadyCailin · 3 years ago
Of course. It's just yet another to add to the pile.