I usually agree with the sentiment but for some reason this implementation is so smooth on my old laptop I like it.

That is not a string output problem. That is a terminal emulator problem. It is not the job of an application to know the modes and behaviors of the invoking terminal/shell. This applies exactly the same for all other applications that write to stdout. There is no cleverness here. But, if you really really want to avoid the ANSI descriptors for other reasons, maybe you just don't liked colored output, my applications features a no-color option that replaces the ANSI control string values with empty strings.

You can get download progress with fetch. You can't get upload progress.

Edit: Actually, you can even get upload progress, but the implementation seems fraught due to scant documentation. You may be better off using XMLHttpRequest for that. I'm going to try a simple implementation now. This has piqued my curiosity.

A multiplayer survival game based around voxel physics.

Can be described as Astroneer-like setting, Teardown voxel physics, in a Valheim-like online multiplayer survival game.

Game isn't really announced yet but I've shown some videos of the tech: https://x.com/Alientrap/status/1909316208563732866 (On Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWISaUmvit4 ) https://x.com/Alientrap/status/1918024969939808654

I was really excited to try this but this does NOT work the way I expected. I wanted a simple git worktree manager for my existing, already-checked-out repository. Instead, it requests Github permissions and clones the repo from Github. This is bad, because you need to run all the dependency installs, etc. for every workspace before being able to test anything. In other words it's like Codex or Cursor Background Agents, except worse, because it's on your machine. The reason I don't use Codex or Background Agents is because my project has way too many dependencies and would take way too long (and too complicated) to install everything required to have an isolated running instance, plus there would be DNS conflicts, external API conflicts, among other issues.

What I do want is simple git worktree management for an already-checked-out repo on my machine, no Github permissions or dependency re-installation (copying node_modules, etc.).

As a full stack dev that runs their own SaaS with thousands of users in production, sometimes I get a very pleasant reminder of how many problems I am blissfully unaware of just because I decided not to build an SPA or use JS frontend frameworks. It never occurred to me that I need such a thing as Zod/ArkType - first time hearing of it, and I have no use for it.

It boggles my mind how much effort and complexity and tooling goes into building an SPA. Entire classes of problems simply don't exist if you choose not to build an SPA. Meanwhile, I use the browser as designed: with full page reloads, backend development only, and occasional reactivity using a backend-only framework like Laravel Livewire. Everything is so simple: from access control to validation to state management. And yes, my app is fast, reactive, modern, SEO friendly, and serves thousands of users in production.

Today I tried "vibe-coding" for the first time using GPT-4o and 4.1. I did it manually - just feeding compilation errors, warnings, and suggestions in a loop via the canvas interface. The file was small, around 150 lines.

It didn't go well. I started with 4o:

- It used a deprecated package.

- After I pointed that out, it didn't update all usages - so I had to fix them manually.

- When I suggested a small logic change, it completely broke the syntax (we're talking "foo() } return )))" kind of broken) and never recovered. I gave it the raw compilation errors over and over again, but it didn't even register the syntax was off - just rewrote random parts of the code instead.

- Then I thought, "maybe 4.1 will be better at coding" (as advertized). But 4.1 refused to use the canvas at all. It just explained what I could change - as in, you go make the edits.

- After some pushing, I got it to use the canvas and return the full code. Except it didn't - it gave me a truncated version of the code with comments like "// omitted for brevity".

That's when I gave up.

Do agents somehow fix this? Because as it stands, the experience feels completely broken. I can't imagine giving this access to bash, sounds way too dangerous.

When you get older, you realize how memories fade, how they disappear, and that’s when you wish you had taken more pictures. I am not talking about young folks shooting photos for the sake of getting likes. I am talking about precious moments, a picture here, a picture there. They will help trigger lost memories. For what is our identity if not a string of recollections we have?