Thanks for the award, kixelated. xD
Also our take on MoQ https://www.wink.co/documentation/WINK-MoQ-Implementation-An...
GitHub: https://github.com/winkmichael/mediamtx-moq
We implemented both WebTransport (for browsers) and native QUIC (for server-to-server) after discovering browsers block raw QUIC. Works today in Chrome/Edge, integrates with existing RTMP/RTSP streams in MediaMTX.
It's clearly impossible for me to try anything in Chinese, I'd need a translation.
1. Baseline Status quo - no changes.
2. Move all $12T into reducing the $36T of US debt. 1 time payment. All 401k’s are reduced to $0.
3. Allow for PE to productize into this $12T, siphoning off various amounts over time.
4. 401k holders can choose their own non-traditional investments.
I’m not advocating for any specific outcome because I know nothing on this topic but as a starting point, show me what happens with each, normalized and compared.
It feels backwards ... engineers need to say if things interoperate, customers search for “ONVIF” to check compatibility, yet instead of helping adoption they act like brand cops. Is this normal for “open standards”? Or is ONVIF.org just uniquely hostile here? I don't think they are right here, but having released a completely free product and got a trademark and a demand for 20k a year and being told I cannot use the word ONVIF in any way shape or form seems insane! Thoughts?