Readit NewsI love to buy small apps from indie developers or donate some money to things I use and I love: when I was a student, of course, things were different.
Nowadays, luckily, I can contribute and I do it gladly.
Get it notorized and ask for some money! I will gladly pay it (and I hope others will do it as well).
Awesome concept: ergonomics and/or posture monitoring is a market opportunity for heavy users.
5 nanometer was something they worked on, but it was TMCS the one who actually made it happen.
Perhaps this is a good chance to put to work some of that research using AMD Manufacturing.
Let’s see how it goes.
On the other hand, the trade-off of repairability, "right to repair" and all the things those businesses and people like Rossmann have been fighting for get affected by the component lock-in.
There must be some kind of middle ground: my bet should be full customer sign-out could then enable the parts to be re-used (anything else should render the device and its components unusable).
Also: it’s a highly quoted movie on YouTube where copyright has not been strictly enforced.
Every part of it is a specific area of the business: the lay offs, the move forward after them, the analyst crunching the data, the gathering after his discovery, the communication, the meetings and the decision making.
All of it from the perspective of a financial institution, knowing what we know: I wonder what would have happened if that movie happened 15 years before the crash and the public perception of the content (probably dismissed as “too Hollywood”).
In general, would you pay for a notorised build of free software, if you had use for that software, even if an un-notorised build or the source code were available?
If notarisation requires you some kind of payment, I would be okay with you charging me some money, if I obviously find your code has a good value for me.
I read comments around here about "Well: you can compile it yourself" or "it's open source! You can check the code by yourself".
And, while all of those arguments are accurate and valid, the point is "I do not feel like it" or, a little reminder, "The Great Suspender" was an example of a beautiful open source little app to suspend tabs on Google Chrome that, one glorious day, switched hands and, suddenly, after some time, someone noticed the repository and the code from the add-in were different, and those changes were made with nefarious intent.
Luckily, somehow found out, but some people do not have the time or the will to be playing that game.
A piece of code that requires access to my camera, regardless of size (<1000 lines of code) or build, it's something I just don't put on my computer without thinking it twice.
Thank you for the tone: I hope I responded to your question :)