Would love a tool that checks your website for these problems.
You’re in luck because such a tool exists :) https://testssl.sh/
Readit Newswolfskaempf commented on Badssl.com (2017) badssl.com/... · Posted by u/g4zj
wolfskaempf commented on Neat Parallel Output in Python bernsteinbear.com/blog/py... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
I like the self-built approach especially for the learning value.
If you’re using this in a CLI tool you’re writing in Python you might be using the library rich anyway, which provides this functionality as well including some extra features.
wolfskaempf commented on A new home and license (AGPL) for Synapse and friends element.io/blog/element-t... · Posted by u/regularjack
This web page tells me they really don't want you to read the license.
https://commission.europa.eu/content/european-union-public-l...
You have to go to a list of languages, and then once you find English on the list it gives you a PDF or text, no HTML version.
I read it, and I think the exception allowing for compatibility with the MPL would allow me to pretty much do what I want with a larger work, as long as I release changes to the code files, and shipped it with some MPL code. It says that where the license conflicts, the compatible license prevails. I'm also not convinced that the Distribution section behaves like the AGPL: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/a/12298
The fact that the EUPL is available in all the official languages of the Member States of the European Union is a very important aspect of the license for me. This means I could reasonably fight for the freedom of my software in the local courts available to me in my home country, which does not have English as an official language.
As the European Commission claims on their site, as one of the reasons they chose to create a new license instead of relying on those already available:
> The licence should have equal legal value in many languages.
In addition, the EUPL is not any license text some (from a legal perspective random) people came up with, but the text of the license was written and voted into law by the EU itself, therefore it can and does rightfully claim the following, which is invaluable to me as a FLOSS author residing in the EU.
> any litigation resulting from the interpretation of this License [...] will be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union [...]
So even if the local courts interpretation in my home country falls short, the Court of Justice of the European Union will surely take into account the intended purpose of this license as laid out by the legislators of the EU.
wolfskaempf commented on NewPipe – Lightweight YouTube experience for Android newpipe.net/... · Posted by u/vyrotek
I wonder if a torrent style equivalent for bandwidth sharing for things like YouTube content creators could work. Like you get ads unless you seed enough and then no ads when you consume.
I think it'd only work as a near seamless ui experience and not actually using torrents or any extra setup or complications. Probably branded a bit differently.
Exactly what you described exists and is called PeerTube.
wolfskaempf commented on Notes from building a blog in Django til.simonwillison.net/dja... · Posted by u/theptip
Nice and simple. I feel the only lacking feature for a basic blog is having unlisted blog posts, which is very handy when you want to share it to proof-readers. This can be done on google doc/hedgedoc [0] for sure, but then when porting there are very often typos creeping in.
The functionality exists in the author's implementation. If you search for 'is_draft' you'll come across the places in the code where this is implemented.
wolfskaempf commented on OpenBikeSensor: Passing Distance Measurement for Cyclists openbikesensor.org... · Posted by u/wolfskaempf
English site: https://www.openbikesensor.org/en/
Unfortunately I noticed too late that the main domain does not automatically redirect to English based on the browser preferences. If someone can replace the link to add the /en/ at the end I would be super grateful.