Not to be ageist, but I find this highly counterintuitive.
when people feel entitled to take up 2 spaces for hours while families roam for seats is when it's too far
Would they really put "comply with cease & desist to reactivate" on the screen?
but interesting write-up. If I were a consumer of OpenFreeMap, I would be concerned that such an availability drop was only detected by user reports
That took the wold from autocomplete to Claude and GPT.
Another 10,000x would do it again, but who has that kind of money or R&D breakthrough?
The way scaling laws work, 5,000x and 10,000x give a pretty similar result. So why is it surprising that competitors land in the same range? It seems hard enough to beat your competitor by 2x let alone 10,000x
Time and time again I would find telltale signs of dumping LLM output into PRs n then claiming it as their own. Not a problem, but the code didn’t do what the detailed ticket asked and introduced other bugs as a result.
It ultimately became a choice of ‘go through the hassle of making a detailed brief for it to just be put in copilot verbatim and then go through the hassle of reviewing it and explaining the issues back to the offshore dev’ or ‘brief Claude directly’
I hate to say it but from a business perspective the latter won outright. It tears me up as it goes against my morality.
I also have concerns about said junior developers wielding such tools, because yes, without being able to supply the right kind of context and being able to understand the difference between a good solution and a bad solution, they will produce tons of awful, but technically working code.
Now that I'm practiced at that, the off-shored part is no longer valuable
as in `sudo pmset -a powernap 0`?
I'd rather not install an entire desktop app if that's all he's doing