Did DF ever allow comments on its own website? I vaguely remember gruber once saying: “If you want to comment on my blog, write your own blog.”
> What bothers me is that it’s unexplained. Which, ultimately, seems not so much censorial as just cowardly.
Huh.
Not that I'm aware. There's some discussion about it in this post from 2010:
- https://without.boats/blog/notes-on-a-smaller-rust/ - https://without.boats/blog/revisiting-a-smaller-rust/
It's also niche, but https://gleam.run/ might be a candidate alternate language, depending on your use-case.
How is the copilot key recognized on OpenBSD? Does it appear like an extra Function key?
I'd like to add that actually there is an official prebuilt Rustup binary available for you at https://win.rustup.rs/aarch64, maybe that will lead to less translation overhead for your Rust workflow :)
Although I wish the author commented about the experiences around the unique (administrative) bits of Chimera itself, such as:
- What's the package manager like, and how does it compare to say, pacman (especially in terms of update speeds and dependency handling)?
- What's it like working with dinit as opposed to systemd? Any annoyances, any compatibility issues with packages that expect systemd?
- Similarly, what's it like working with the FreeBSD userland, as opposed to GNU? Any script breakages due to differences in the switches? Because virtually every other distro ships with GNU coreutils, I would expect a decent chunk of popular scripts to fail on Chimera, if they weren't writen with BSD in mind. This is currently my biggest concern with Chimera. I also wonder if I can replace the BSD utils with the Rust uutils and without breaking things...
It's apk, so well known through Alpine Linux already. Dependency handling is elegant: https://chimera-linux.org/docs/apk/world
> - What's it like working with dinit as opposed to systemd? Any annoyances, any compatibility issues with packages that expect systemd?
It's unremarkable in a good way. It works and I've not encountered any issues as a user. I've not run into any compatibility issues, most systemd units are usually easily translated. I kinda miss having a centralised journal. I think that's something q66 wants to address at some point.
> - Similarly, what's it like working with the FreeBSD userland, as opposed to GNU? Any script breakages due to differences in the switches? Because virtually every other distro ships with GNU coreutils, I would expect a decent chunk of popular scripts to fail on Chimera, if they weren't writen with BSD in mind. This is currently my biggest concern with Chimera. I also wonder if I can replace the BSD utils with the Rust uutils and without breaking things...
Aside from the diff issue it's a non-issue. The Mac OS X userland is/was derived from them too, so there's already a lot of compatibility work been done. Most scripts that are intended to be run by a broad audience already stick to POSIX features.