Readit News logoReadit News
weevil commented on Is it a bubble?   oaktreecapital.com/insigh... · Posted by u/saigrandhi
weevil · 15 days ago
> I don’t know any more about AI than most generalist investors.

This statement is redundant; the article screams with the author's ignorance.

weevil commented on Replacing tmux in my dev workflow   bower.sh/you-might-not-ne... · Posted by u/elashri
meitham · 5 months ago
The author of Kitty, Kovid Goyal, calls running tmux on local sessions an “anti-pattern” in the linked GitHub issue. I can’t help but find that a bit ironic, because the very first time I tried Kitty, I was in the middle of work when I discovered Arabic support was broken - https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/536 . I simply launched the macOS Terminal app, attached to the same tmux session, verified my Arabic text rendered correctly, and then closed Kitty. Without tmux, I would’ve been forced to recreate my entire workflow from scratch.
weevil · 5 months ago
Anyone calling anything an anti-pattern without evidence always sounds to me like 'I don't like how you do this, but I need to find a more cerebral way of describing that so I don't sound like a child.'
weevil commented on UK will give sovereignty of Chagos Islands to Mauritius   bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c... · Posted by u/andystanton
botanical · a year ago
France needs to give back sovereignty of so many islands around Madagascar. It's galling that they still act like a colonial state.
weevil · a year ago
Don't you mean 'Gaulling'
weevil commented on Why wordfreq will not be updated   github.com/rspeer/wordfre... · Posted by u/tomthe
eadmund · a year ago
> the Web at large is full of slop generated by large language models, written by no one to communicate nothing

That’s neither fair nor accurate. That slop is ultimately generated by the humans who run those models; they are attempting (perhaps poorly) to communicate something.

> two companies that I already despise

Life’s too short to go through it hating others.

> it's very likely because they are creating a plagiarism machine that will claim your words as its own

That begs the question. Plagiarism has a particular definition. It is not at all clear that a machine learning from text should be treated any differently from a human being learning from text: i.e., duplicating exact phrases or failing to credit ideas may in some circumstances be plagiarism, but no-one is required to append a statement crediting every text he has ever read to every document he ever writes.

Credits: every document I have ever read grin

weevil · a year ago
I feel like you're giving certain entities too much credit there. Yes text is generated to do _something_, but it may not be to communicate in good-faith; it could be keyword-dense gibberish designed to attract unsuspecting search engine users for click revenue, or generate political misinformation disseminated to a network of independent-looking "news" websites, or pump certain areas with so much noise and nonsense information that those spaces cannot sustain any kind of meaningful human conversation.

The issue with generative 'AI' isn't that they generate text, it's that they can (and are) used to generate high-volume low-cost nonsense at a scale no human could ever achieve without them.

> Life’s too short to go through it hating others

Only when they don't deserve it. I have my doubts about Google, but I've no love for OpenAI.

> Plagiarism has a particular definition ... no-one is required to append a statement crediting every text he has ever read

Of course they aren't, because we rightly treat humans learning to communicate differently from training computer code to predict words in a sentence and pass it off as natural language with intent behind it. Musicians usually pay royalties to those whose songs they sample, but authors don't pay royalties to other authors whose work inspired them to construct their own stories maybe using similar concepts. There's a line there somewhere; falsely equating plagiarism and inspiration (or natural language learning in humans) misses the point.

weevil commented on Ask HN: How to manage phones and PCs for elderly parents?    · Posted by u/thepuppet33r
weevil · 2 years ago
ChromeOS is a good idea if all they do is surf; security risks are pretty low. iPhones are also fairly safe, but the older they get, the slower they'll get and the more you have to support them. I've had to explain to my dad that eventually the software on the phone will be so old that new apps can't go on it. He looks at me in confusion and aggression and asks why, as though I'm responsible for Apple's planned obsolescence.

My family was ultimately able to convince my grandmother to get rid of her computers altogether, when her dementia really kicked in. I think we were lucky as she never really got on with computers, and would tell anyone who'd listen how computers 'came in' to her office the year she retired (in the 90s) and so never needed to learn.

weevil commented on ChatGPT went berserk   garymarcus.substack.com/p... · Posted by u/RafelMri
sensanaty · 2 years ago
(warning: I'm going on a bit of a rant out of frustration and it's not wholly relevant to the article)

I'm getting tired of these shitty AI chatbots, and we're barely at the start of the whole thing.

Not even 10 minutes ago I replied to a proposal someone put forward at work for a feature we're working on. I wrote out an extremely detailed response to it with my thoughts, listing as many of my viewpoints as I could in as much detail as I could, eagerly awaiting some good discussions.

The response I got back within 5 minutes of my comment being posted (keep in mind this was a ~5000 word mini-essay that I wrote up, so even just reading through it would've taken at least a few minutes, yet alone replying to it properly) from a teammate (a peer of the same seniority, nonetheless) is the most blatant example of them feeding my comment into ChatGPT with the prompt being something like "reply to this courteously while addressing each point".

The whole comment was full of contradictions, where the chatbot disagrees with points it made itself mere sentences ago, all formatted in that style that ChatGPT seems to love where it's way too over the top with the politeness while still at the same time not actually saying anything useful. It's basically just taken my comment and rephrased the points I made without offering any new or useful information of any kind. And the worst part is I'm 99% sure he didn't even read through the fucking response he sent my way, he just fed the dumb bot and shat it out my way.

Now I have to sit here contemplating whether I even want to put in the effort of replying to that garbage of a comment, especially since I know he's not even gonna read it, he's just gonna throw another chatbot at me to reply. What a fucking meme of an industry this has become.

weevil · 2 years ago
Gah that is frustrating.

The replies you're getting are a bit reminiscent of the "guns don't kill people, people kill people" defense of firearms - like, yes that's true, but the gun makes it a lot easier to do.

weevil commented on AI 'hallucinated' fake legal cases filed to B.C. court in Canadian first   globalnews.ca/news/102386... · Posted by u/luu
flanked-evergl · 2 years ago
How are language models doing what they are known to do newsworthy? This feels a bit like reporting that water is wet.
weevil · 2 years ago
The story isn't about LLMs doing LLM stuff. It's about lawyers using LLMs as a shortcut for proper legal work, laboring under the delusion that it is entirely accurate, honest and 'intelligent', and the ramifications for the legal system.
weevil commented on Future gigantic solar farms might impact solar power elsewhere in the world   techxplore.com/news/2024-... · Posted by u/gumby
weevil · 2 years ago
This will be laundered by anti-climate-crisis psychos as 'look how bad solar is for the planet! Better maintain the status quo.'
weevil commented on Cybertruck Is Already a Production Nightmare for Tesla   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/mfiguiere
ivraatiems · 2 years ago
Why would anyone want a "stainless steel" pickup truck?
weevil · 2 years ago
Of all the questionable things Musk has done in the last few years, trying to sell a stainless steel electric truck doesn't even make the top 25.

u/weevil

KarmaCake day160December 21, 2022View Original