So in your opinion, how should we determine who should have this knowledge?

Saying they make it “open source” in the same article where they say they need “350k high end GPUs to build it”. Is the equivalent of saying: ”we offer free nuclear submarine driving lessons”.

I know you don’t need as many resources for inference as for training. But still…

I must be still confused. The startup employee knows what their strike price was and here Carta was offering to hook them up with a buyer for those shares at price $X (which I presume is/was different than the strike price of the employee).

Maybe I'm misunderstanding? But that doesn't seem like they're sharing cap table data with anyone. They've found a buyer for the employee's shares at some price. Is it implied that they shared the cap table info with that buyer (i.e. the third party investor)?

Can anybody explain the fundamental issue with the original reach out from the Carta employee?

Barring something within the shareholder agreement (between the startup employee and the startup) that bars the employee from selling those shares on Carta's platform, what's the issue?

Yay, an internet pizza thread. Get ready for:

1) snobby east coasters telling everyone what good pizza is, which is only found at the slice shop in their neighborhood;

2) no true Scotsmen, keepers of the purity of pizza, arriving to tell everyone what isn’t pizza (typically a subset of 1);

3) random people in Midwest locations describing how their favorite pizza has ranch as the base, or is cooked in a deep fryer, or whatever other local innovations/aberrations (sure to be shouted down by 1 and 2).

Vetted always means people with the time, resources and desire to navigate through the vetting process, which makes them biased.

Why are people signing up and wanting to receive MORE censorship and advertising? The internet has become a very strange place.

Are these charts simply displaying the gradual decline in children-under-13 walking and riding bicycles?

It's one thing to add stories to a startup website and created the illusion of a couple dozen users instead of just zero. But all these years later Reddit has millions and millions of unique users per month and is still one of the top ten most visited websites in the US and has been for many years, beat out only by google/meta properties and wikipedia etc. You can fake "activity" internally but it's harder to fake stats calculated by independent evaluators.

And if it wasn't, everybody would be doing it. What makes you think reddit would have an advantage in doing that over anyone else?