Readit News logoReadit News
waylandsmithers commented on Software development topics I've changed my mind on   chriskiehl.com/article/th... · Posted by u/belter
zafka · 7 months ago
"93%, maybe 95.2%, of project managers, could disappear tomorrow to either no effect or a net gain in efficiency. (this estimate is up from 4 years ago)"

This made me laugh it is so true. My last big project at "Big Co" ( Knee surgery robot ) My small group went through 4 project managers - just for our small team. The entire project had probably 20. While a few where enjoyable to work with, there was very little value added and a lot of time spent filling them in.

waylandsmithers · 7 months ago
I was really surprised to hear this because I feel the exact opposite! I've worked mainly with project managers who ran all the ceremonies, held people accountable, dealt with planning and doling out tasks, handled stakeholders and generally protected the devs from distractions, and took real leadership and accountability in the project.

Whenever I've worked on a team where a developer is the team lead and has to do all that stuff on top of coding- or worse, it's just a free for all with no leader- , things in my experience go much worse, communication breaks down, and things slip through the cracks.

waylandsmithers commented on I'm Mad as Hell About Square's Shady Automatic Emails   wired.com/story/rants-and... · Posted by u/gwerbret
waylandsmithers · 10 months ago
Tangentially, the company I worked for years ago used ZenPayroll/Gusto. Seemed fine enough with a nice design and definitely friendlier to the end user than the gray boxes in ADP.

I started a new job recently that also uses Gusto. They added a bunch of things like a Gusto wallet you can get paid into instead of your own bank account and another feature that basically looks like a payday loan. I guess it makes sense for them to expand their offerings of financial products since they're already involved with your money but it just made me feel disappointed.

waylandsmithers commented on Microsoft stock drops over 6% after results fall short in AI disappointment   finance.yahoo.com/news/mi... · Posted by u/wslh
waylandsmithers · a year ago
Meanwhile, the overall results don't make it seem like the sky is falling

> For the quarter, Microsoft reported earnings per share (EPS) of $2.95 on revenue of $64.7 billion. Wall Street was anticipating EPS of $2.94 on revenue of $64.5 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

waylandsmithers commented on Why are most sofas so bad?   dwell.com/article/dtc-sof... · Posted by u/jtsnow
waylandsmithers · a year ago
...not to mention furniture stores seem to keep no inventory, so you get it 6-8 weeks after you buy because that's how it takes them to build and ship your new couch
waylandsmithers commented on Glassdoor updated my profile to add my real name and location   cellio.dreamwidth.org/202... · Posted by u/throwaway_08932
toomuchtodo · a year ago
How is this not fraud?

https://help.glassdoor.com/s/article/I-m-an-employer-What-ca...

> You can't pay us to take down reviews and we apply the same content moderation rules to our clients that we use for everyone else.

https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/

https://www.naag.org/find-my-ag/

waylandsmithers · a year ago
A few of the tricks I've noticed they use:

* Review not tagged as English, or neither Full-Time or Part-Time, and those are the default filters

* Default sort is "Most Recent" and the Featured Review at the top of reviews is always a positive hand chosen review

* "Found 515 out of over 530 reviews" - I suspect they maybe take those 15 other reviews into account for the rating average, but you just can't read them right now so technically not taken down

* Negative review stays in Pending state while being screened by Glassdoor for over a month, but the time it's approved, it's buried by newer reviews

*

waylandsmithers commented on Glassdoor updated my profile to add my real name and location   cellio.dreamwidth.org/202... · Posted by u/throwaway_08932
OJFord · a year ago
TripAdvisor? They charge for advertising/sponsored positioning, but it's free to claim your business and it allows you to respond to people but pretty sure not do 'moderation' like that.
waylandsmithers · a year ago
The reviews might be real, but the order you see anything, say Top 10 hotels in Indianapolis, is the result of an auction
waylandsmithers commented on Mourning Google   tbray.org/ongoing/When/20... · Posted by u/cdme
eigenvalue · 2 years ago
What happened with Google has nothing to do with “late stage capitalism” and everything to do with horrible management. You only have to compare Sundar to Satya to see what could have been possible for Google with better leadership and vision. Particularly given the legacy Google had to work with and the early focus on AI which was thoroughly squandered.

Capitalism will start to really work its magic when Google’s operating profit and stock price start falling and all their best developers jump ship to better companies (this part has already started). Then they will fully follow the model trailblazed by such erstwhile innovators as Polaroid, Kodak, and Xerox.

waylandsmithers · 2 years ago
> has nothing to do with “late stage capitalism”

Couldn't agree more, and the ironic thing about this phrase is that it's really more reminiscent of the pre-depression era of robber barons, price fixing, no workers rights, Panic of 18XX where companies really got too powerful and ran wild because there wasn't enough regulation yet

waylandsmithers commented on New York will plant trees using new tech to maximize foliage impact   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
onlyrealcuzzo · 2 years ago
> Tangent but David Harvey says "wealth redistribution is the lowest form of socialism". A better way is to do a few things differently so those people are better empowered to make more money for themselves.

This is a pretty interesting take.

From a Capitalist perspective, people know what they want - and the market is "efficient" when you let people do what they want. There's nothing more efficient than giving people money.

From a Socialist perspective - I guess this is obviously wrong? If an economy free of government interventions worked, you wouldn't need Socialism in the first place? So it's better to let the government make investments on your behalf?

waylandsmithers · 2 years ago
I think the point was that a socialist system could provide more services, perhaps to the point where cash transfers wouldn't be necessary

u/waylandsmithers

KarmaCake day832January 16, 2013View Original