Readit News logoReadit News
vonquant commented on Meta forced to reveal anonymous Facebook user's identity   stackdiary.com/meta-force... · Posted by u/skilled
mellosouls · 2 years ago
fairly petty civil actions

If you're the person having their reputation smeared by anonymous cowards it maybe doesn't seem so "petty" as you dismiss.

This seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do; have the person slandering somebody anonymously brought into the light where there is a level playing field in which they can present their case.

vonquant · 2 years ago
I'm not sure it's creditable that enough credence is being given to these anonymous claims in a private group to be impacting this person's life. Seems more akin to a slapp.
vonquant commented on Meta fined $1.3B over data transfers to U.S.   wsj.com/articles/meta-fin... · Posted by u/jaredwiener
Veen · 2 years ago
Curious how Nick Clegg has changed his tune on data collection since he went to work for Facebook. When he was leader of the Liberal Democrats and UK Deputy PM, he was strongly in favour of a data "Bill of Rights" that would limit and control data collection and sharing. I wonder what changed his mind?
vonquant · 2 years ago
Money is often a compelling argument.
vonquant commented on Journalist’s phone hacked: all he had to do was visit any website   thestar.com/news/canada/2... · Posted by u/vezycash
pdimitar · 5 years ago
I'm probably naive here because I'm not versed in networks -- but couldn't he avoid surveillance by using a VPN? Wasn't one of the design features of VPNs that your connection can't be hijacked?
vonquant · 5 years ago
Of course, the VPN could be the one doing the hijacking.
vonquant commented on Zoom to bring end-to-end encryption to all users, including non-paying   blog.zoom.us/wordpress/20... · Posted by u/jmsflknr
just-ok · 5 years ago
This could be the case for literally any E2EE service that controls key distribution (including WhatsApp, Signal, etc.), especially when there's no way to verify key fingerprints (here Signal differs because it does have a way, and it's open source so you can be more confident that it's not BSing you).

It's shocking to me how often this is glossed over when discussing E2EE services: you still must trust the platform.

vonquant · 5 years ago
E2EE and open source: the two things people assume automatically makes things super-crazy-secure.

The implementation of E2EE must be robust and there must be somebody who is actually checking the source code (plus verifiable builds)

vonquant commented on Zoom to bring end-to-end encryption to all users, including non-paying   blog.zoom.us/wordpress/20... · Posted by u/jmsflknr
beached_whale · 5 years ago
Alex Stamos had a good thread on some of the costs and benefits of E2EE. There is a cost https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1268219067707453441
vonquant · 5 years ago
People who wish to mask their crimes have a greater incentive to use E2EE so will probably gravitate towards platforms that offer it. I would therefore suggest those not committing crimes are disproportionately affected by E2EE not being made the default where possible. Once one service in a particular category offers E2EE, the benefits of the other services in that category not offering it is significantly reduced.
vonquant commented on Google adds experimental setting to hide full URLs in Chrome 85 address bar   androidpolice.com/2020/06... · Posted by u/vezycash
bigyikes · 5 years ago
What’s so bad about hiding www? I kind of prefer it hidden
vonquant · 5 years ago
www.example.com and example.com don't necessarily resolve to the same place.
vonquant commented on Show HN: Collected Notes – A note-taking blogging app I made   collectednotes.com/... · Posted by u/alecrosa
vonquant · 5 years ago
Hey, this looks great.

One thing you might want to consider is having one domain for a website about collectednotes (collectednotes.com) and another for hosting user's blogs (collectednotes.blog for example) because it is currently not clear what urls are official and made by you and which are just blogs made by anyone.

For example, https://collectednotes.com/accounts/ is genuine and made by you whilst https://collectednotes.com/account/ is a blog I just created. To me there seems a very real risk of users being mislead.

vonquant · 5 years ago
On second thoughts, using a sub domain would make way more sense.
vonquant commented on Show HN: Collected Notes – A note-taking blogging app I made   collectednotes.com/... · Posted by u/alecrosa
alecrosa · 5 years ago
Less than a month ago I decided to build an app for myself to solve a very specific problem:

“I want to be able to take notes on my phone, share some of them online, and publish a few on my personal blog — oh, an I also want an API!”

I built this is because no tool out there satisfied my needs: - Notion had no native app so it's very slow to use on mobile. Plus is too general. - Medium is a disaster for readers, they shouldn't be the ones paying to read. Native app is slow AF. - Most note-taking apps were too complex and feature creep. I wanted speed + power with simplicity first. Just give me markdown. - Apps are either online or offline, none tried to mix those two models seamlessly. - Blogs are either static (I need to be on my laptop and code) or use CMS which are too general and complex.

I sense there’s a demand for an easy to use native note-taking app that can also serve as an online publishing platform. A place where you can use your domain and update your notes right from your phone.

Of course, this is just a theory, so I would love to see if you all find it useful. You can try it https://collectednotes.com

Features:

- Simplicity. - Markdown with live preview. - Custom Domains. - No ads, no tracking, no modals, no vanity, no nonsense. - No data lock-in. Export your notes from day one. - Restful API, Your Notes in different formats. - Native experience iPhone & iPad: Share extension, Quick actions, FaceID, Quick Actions, Keychain, Keyboard shortcuts, Slide Over & Split View, Dark Mode.

Sample note: https://collectednotes.com/blog/api, Would love to hear what you all think

vonquant · 5 years ago
Hey, this looks great.

One thing you might want to consider is having one domain for a website about collectednotes (collectednotes.com) and another for hosting user's blogs (collectednotes.blog for example) because it is currently not clear what urls are official and made by you and which are just blogs made by anyone.

For example, https://collectednotes.com/accounts/ is genuine and made by you whilst https://collectednotes.com/account/ is a blog I just created. To me there seems a very real risk of users being mislead.

vonquant commented on Lawsuit over online book lending could bankrupt Internet Archive   arstechnica.com/tech-poli... · Posted by u/nixass
zozbot234 · 5 years ago
> is no longer lending digital books via "controlled digital lending."

This is definitely inaccurate. Many elements of CDL are clearly still in effect, such as the use of DRM to enforce the "check out" provision. It's a real lending system. The only thing that's new is the "unlimited" claim wrt. the number of copies that can be checked out at any given time - and we still don't know how far that "unlimited" actually goes. We should wait for IA's legal response on this.

vonquant · 5 years ago
Is the extent of the 'unlimited' important? Lending a single book more than they own is an impossibility if they are respecting IP - no different to a physical library photocopying entire books so they can lend more.
vonquant commented on Age, Sex, Existing Conditions of Covid-19 Cases and Deaths   worldometers.info/coronav... · Posted by u/davedx
vonquant · 6 years ago
Oh let me see, perhaps it has something to do with China being a one-party state with a ripe history of human rights atrocities and pervasive censorship.

Just look at SARS for an example of where trusting the official information from China made for a terrible idea.

u/vonquant

KarmaCake day76December 27, 2019View Original