Readit NewsThe status quo is you or I can travel without significant non-government privacy concerns, as we blend into the crowd of millions of normal air travelers. Celebrities can't do that, as they get noticed by the public. Keeping the movements of their planes private just helps celebrities get to enjoy a similar level of privacy as the rest of us. I see nothing wrong with that.
Furthermore, it's good that celebrities value their privacy. Everyone should. We can all members of society to value privacy and for those values to filter down into laws that also protect it.
Of course the pressing question is, if this is the start field for a Conway game-of-life, do any interesting patterns evolve?
It would be fun to brute-force a few starting grid sizes and seeing how long the game continues. Games that last more than a few steps can be set aside for human evaluation.
Because if it turns out that some particular smallish grid or spiral of primes causes something interesting to happen in game-of-life, then you can imagine HN melting down!?
Most of the people are so considerate about what they eat, good ingredients, nice compositions, making it look pretty as well..
..and then they proceed to shove great amounts of that chemical sugary shit down their throats !
Where do you get that? Is eating normal (whatever that means) amount of candies only on Saturday is triggering you to do such out of proportion comparisons?
IIRC he found a way to download streetview images without paying, and used the OCR built-in to macOS (which is really good).