Out of interest I tried running my Primes benchmark [1] on both the x86_64 and x86 Alpine and the riscv64 Buildroot, both in Chrome on M1 Mac Mini. Both are 2nd run so that all needed code is already cached locally.

x86_64:

    localhost:~# time gcc -O primes.c -o primes
    real    0m 3.18s
    user    0m 1.30s
    sys     0m 1.47s
    localhost:~# time ./primes
    Starting run
    3713160 primes found in 456995 ms
    245 bytes of code in countPrimes()
    real    7m 37.97s
    user    7m 36.98s
    sys     0m 0.00s
    localhost:~# uname -a
    Linux localhost 6.19.3 #17 PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Mar  9 17:12:35 CET 2026 x86_64 Linux

x86 (i.e. 32 bit):

    localhost:~# time gcc -O primes.c -o primes
    real    0m 2.08s
    user    0m 1.43s
    sys     0m 0.64s
    localhost:~# time ./primes
    Starting run
    3713160 primes found in 348424 ms
    301 bytes of code in countPrimes()
    real    5m 48.46s
    user    5m 37.55s
    sys     0m 10.86s
    localhost:~# uname -a
    Linux localhost 4.12.0-rc6-g48ec1f0-dirty #21 Fri Aug 4 21:02:28 CEST 2017 i586 Linux

riscv64:

    [root@localhost ~]# time gcc -O primes.c -o primes
    real    0m 2.08s
    user    0m 1.13s
    sys     0m 0.93s
    [root@localhost ~]# time ./primes
    Starting run
    3713160 primes found in 180893 ms
    216 bytes of code in countPrimes()
    real    3m 0.90s
    user    3m 0.89s
    sys     0m 0.00s
    [root@localhost ~]# uname -a
    Linux localhost 4.15.0-00049-ga3b1e7a-dirty #11 Thu Nov 8 20:30:26 CET 2018 riscv64 GNU/Linux

Conclusion: as seen also in QEMU (also started by Bellard!), RISC-V is a *lot* easier to emulate than x86. If you're building code specifically to run in emulation, use RISC-V: builds faster, smaller code, runs faster.

Note: quite different gcc versions, with x86_64 being 15.2.0, x86 9.3.0, and riscv64 7.3.0.

[1] http://hoult..rg/primes.txt