> How does it not undermine a paper's journalistic ethics to be neutral and fair?
Assuming neutrality isn't something that we should expect newspapers to value, then I think transparency is an good alternative. A presidential endorsement can be a good thing in that the newspaper staff are being openly transparent about their political bias.
I can't speak for your friends. But I think that when someone says "can't afford" what they really mean is "I'd rather spend that money on something else".
Some people literally can't afford children. But those in the middle class (or better) in the US certainly can. It would just take money away from other parts of their lifestyle: the home the live in; the car they drive; ability to vacation; newest phone model, etc.
Generally, the more money you make in the US, the fewer kids you have. So, for most, it's hard to argue that they can't "afford" children. They can't afford children while maintaining their same lifestyle. And that will generally always be true (except for the truly rich).
Here is the cost of living by state: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/homeowners/states-with-lowes...
Some interesting states are West Virginia.
Cost of living is hard to calculate and I don’t know the best source. This one might be better: https://www.epi.org/resources/budget/budget-map/
Idk if the fertility rate is factored into the cost of living calculator … if it is then I guess the measure isn’t relevant.
The most famous example is probably: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoshihiro_Akiyama
This guy is a fourth-generation Korean-Japanese athlete, but was still never considered Japanese by the Japanese fanbase, he was frequently booed and heckled, and he went on to compete under the S.Korean flag. And this guy's father and grandfather were born in Japan, and he looks ethnically indistinguishable from the Japanese.
It's pure fantasy that second-generation Indonesians or Filipinos are going to integrate into Japanese society. It's going to be extremely painful, if it's attempted.
If you could find a book just going through the relevant bits you wouldnt really have to "learn math again", it can be translated into english straightforwardly -- very very few ML papers relevant to industry have extended proofs, etc. that require eg., even being able to differentiate anything yourself.
90% of it is: here's the domain (ie., type) of our variables, here's the formula of our functions, we're taking a weighted average with some inner products involved.
It might sound like a lot of math, but it's really all doable in semester-1 of an undergrad course, were it focused enough.
What I would like to see is a logical introduction to computer science, or at least theoretical computer science.
Start with combinational logic [1], i.e. with Boolean circuits. They are both conceptually simple and relatively close to physical transistors, unlike any functional / mathematical approach. Then move on to sequential logic[2] which allows the introduction of memory/states, e.g. via flip-flops. From this, more complex circuits and even a primitive GOTO language would be introduced. What I would be interested in is how these circuits relate to the traditional models of computation, i.e. finite state machines, pushdown automatons and Turing machines. Not very cleanly, I suspect.