Very good README.md, teasing and explaining very well the the provided value. Well done!
Readit Newsurduntupu commented on Show HN: Pyper – Concurrent Python Made Simple github.com/pyper-dev/pype... · Posted by u/pyper-dev
urduntupu commented on Unix Time and a Modest Proposal johndcook.com/blog/2024/1... · Posted by u/tapan_jk
The ratio is around 365.2422. Calling it 365 is too crude. Julius Caesar said we should call it 365 1/4, and that was good enough for a while.
That's blowing your mind because the currently implicitly or mindlessly acknowledged understanding by the majority of people is that today is the peak of human's evolution. Majority thinks that they inherently and collectively know everything better in relation to what our ancestors knew, especially compared to those thousands of years ago. But how do you really know. Because they had no iPhones and cars? Development of technical tools, yeah there we _might_ well be on the peak, but that doesn't really cover all aspects of actually _understanding_ our earth and the universe.
urduntupu commented on BlackSheep: Fast ASGI web framework for Python github.com/Neoteroi/Black... · Posted by u/klaussilveira
Another ASGI web framework mimicking the Flask API: https://github.com/pallets/quart/
That mammals were not in existence for the larger part of that very warm period. So the fact that life existed through it has little bearing on human civilization thriving through a similar one, as parent seemed to imply.
Let's, I am not afraid of the earth getting much warmer, I see it as mostly fear mongering. If it's really getting _that_ hot that we mammals can't survive, then let that be it. There's the notorious idea of some humans that we can control everything. Let's continue keeping the earth a clean, healthy space, let's stop producing so much waste, let's clean the water, I am all in. But to believe that we are heating up the earth, I'm glad that not all agree to that nonsense.
We are on the natural rise after a natural ice period. Just check long term temperature curves and stop looking short term, making it look like there has ever been the same average temperature on earth.
Switching the subject and going "oh really, then what about…" is not really a good way to have an argument. The existence of one thing doesn't change the other.
In this particular case, your claim has been promoted by conspiracy theorists, and is not true. What the video you posted does not show (because it's been carefully edited and has no audio) is that he was repeatedly asked by the police to leave. They're not giving him a "guided tour".
AP debunked it back when the Carlson broadcast that video:
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-january-6-jacob-chansl....
Tucker Carlson is uses conspiracy theory and misinformation as a tool to stoke rage and undermine political enemies. He has portrayed abortion as human sacrifice, blamed hurricanes on abortion, denied man-made climate change, and is constantly caught in blatant and often ridiculous lies. Clearly his charm has worked on you, though, and I don't really know what else to say.
You are mistaken, it's not Tucker Carlson who convinced me that climate change isn't man made, it's the many many facts that speaks against a climate change that is significantly influenced by man. Our influence is just significantly too small. And I am not talking about pollution here, I condemn water, sky and soil pollution as anyone else who loves this beautiful earth.
And when it comes to abortion, I do think it can be considered in some way or the other as human sacrifice, but again, that's not thanks to what you find charming in Tucker Carlson. I don't even like him too much, but he's got it right on many points. You call that a lie, fine with me. But I call it a lie that the forceful Capitol entering was a "storming", I still consider it pretty much staged by agitators, following a nice blueprint which has been played out in other countries, too.
And after all, you are boring calling those things conspiracy theories. This lolly has been eaten so many times, it's lost its taste already.
They did not. Protesters broke into two different entrances (which has been abundantly documented), then opened the doors from inside. This video is editing it together to look like the police welcomed the protesters in.
Ah really? And what about this staged "storming" which rather looks like a guided tour by police through the rooms with the police opening doors?
https://nypost.com/2023/03/06/jan-6-footage-shows-cops-bring...
Why is your CNN not talking about that? Not fitting their narrative, mhm?
Dead Comment
Dead Comment