Readit News logoReadit News
afarrell commented on The Closing of the Bulgarian Frontier   switchyardmag.com/issue-1... · Posted by u/rubin55
arp242 · 2 years ago
It seems to me that historically, "the church, temple, or other spiritual community" filling that role has come with all the same downsides as the nation-state filling that role. And that's not a comment about religion – any organisation is at risk of abuse of that type because that's just how humans and organisations work.

And fully agree with "care for the people I can as I learn to love and be loved", but at the same time people do need some sense of "community", "togetherness", and "we're all in it together"-ness, especially in times when things are perhaps not going so well, and I do feel that's rather been lost.

afarrell · 2 years ago
Any organization made of humans is indeed fallible and corruptible. I have heard some dark stories of this. They are not mine to tell.

Still, the people who say they are trying to uphold a responsibility are more likely to do so with care than those who are trying to do something else.

If a father needs someone to watch his 4-year-old daughter, is it wiser to drop her off at a daycare or at a post office logistics warehouse?

afarrell commented on The Closing of the Bulgarian Frontier   switchyardmag.com/issue-1... · Posted by u/rubin55
jlangenauer · 2 years ago
I was born in Australia and live in Germany, and I think I see something of the same: in both countries, there is no sense of purpose, no raison d'etre. There is no national project beyond managing a series of externally-imposed and self-inflicted crises, and no obvious direction for the future to guide the decisions taken today.

So our politics (in both countries) becomes reactive and unanchored, solving whatever problem seems most pressing today, and ultimately devoid of meaning. What do individuals do in such an environment? They look after themselves, they partake in consumerism, they try to protect themselves against things the state can no longer be bothered to. It's all very nihilistic, and thus the deep anomie that seems to have infected most Western societies, and the younger generations most of all.

afarrell · 2 years ago
My purpose is to care for the people I can as I learn to love and be loved.

It is not the job of the nation-state to give people a deep sense of purpose. That is a job for a church, temple, or other spiritual community. Governments which try to do that job tend to do badly, sometimes with monstrous results. They ought be separate.

afarrell commented on To revive Portland, officials seek to ban public drug use   nytimes.com/2023/12/11/us... · Posted by u/mikhael
1letterunixname · 2 years ago
The root cause in both instances isn't drugs and so infinite spending or (de)criminalization won't matter. The core issue is hope. In the absence of work for the abled and care for the disabled and housing, there isn't much hope and so crimes, habits, and deaths of despair take hold. Without holistic and comprehensive betterment of people who feel ignored and cheated, there isn't much for this growing sector of society to look forward to. It should be no wonder why many people are so desperate and put faith in a lying, vindictive con artist like Trump.
afarrell · 2 years ago
I have come to the conclusion that lots of humans have a religion-shaped hole in their psyche. It is far better to fill it with a stable, local, hope-giving religion.

Hymns are a better opiate of the masses than fentanyl.

afarrell commented on Show HN: An app to create asynchronous micro podcasts   roadsaudio.com/... · Posted by u/1manstartup
afarrell · 2 years ago
Thank you so much! I have been wanting something like this for a long long time!

Can you add a monthly GoCardless subscription so I can help this service continue to exist?

afarrell commented on The Tyranny of the Marginal User   nothinghuman.substack.com... · Posted by u/ivee
com2kid · 2 years ago
I ran a startup making something similar to this pre-covid, it wasn't just date night, it was "find something to do in under 5 minutes". Groups of 4 to 6, partnering with local businesses who hosted the events. You opened the app, said what you wanted to do and when, and you were automatically put into a group. You could select how many people you already had going with you (date, or just a group of 2 friends who needed a few more people for a cooking class or whatnot).

No photos until just before the event started, because photos turn things into a beauty contest and people start judging on looks, which is where, IMHO, all my competition in the same space went wrong.

Events were scheduled for as little as 4 hours out, and only up to 72hrs in the future. The entire app flow was designed to be as close as possible to a "I am bored, entertain me now" button.

Investors hated it, two sided marketplaces are apparently something they like to avoid due to difficulties around execution.

People were desperate for this type of service though, for one marketing campaign my user acquisition cost dropped as low as 15 cents per user.

(If any investor reading wants to throw me a million I'll start it back up again. ;) Solving the loneliness epidemic in America's cities is a huge chance to do some social good!)

afarrell · 2 years ago
Perhaps then it is better run as a feature of a city’s local newspaper. They already have the advertising department side of the marketplace. Does anyone at the Boston Globe want to buy your code?
afarrell commented on The Tyranny of the Marginal User   nothinghuman.substack.com... · Posted by u/ivee
anigbrowl · 2 years ago
Would this solve the problem of finding people to have sex with? No, but computers are bad at sex.

Are they? I thought hookup sites like Tinder and Grindr were very popular.

afarrell · 2 years ago
So is alcohol.
afarrell commented on The Tyranny of the Marginal User   nothinghuman.substack.com... · Posted by u/ivee
postmodest · 2 years ago
It should also be noted that match.com knows that it's business isn't "connecting people in stable relationships" but "luring people to pay for match.com by promising them connections that never work out."

OKCupid had a model that increases the likelihood of matching with someone and ...never using OKCupid again.

Match.com realizes that fundamental flaw. For their business to survive, they HAVE to be bad at the service they purport to provide. They don't want people to have long term relationships, they want people to use a dating site.

There are "societal good" functions that companies might provide, for which a profit motive is wholly un-applicable without destroying the function itself.

There are some things that you simply CANNOT express in a "free market" because the measure of their success cannot be expressed in market terms.

afarrell · 2 years ago
A dating site could work sustainably if it was a site for planning date nights. Make profiles based on activities and swipe right or left on the activities you want to do.

Revenue sources would include:

- Ads for local businesses, classes, and events.

- Annual subscription which is cheaper after the first year and gives you discount codes to events and restaurants.

Once you get the site to work for date nights, let people be open to getting matched based on similar activity interests. Then you can solve the problem of two users finding a specific joint activity.

Would this solve the problem of finding people to have sex with? No, but computers are bad at sex.

Would this solve the problem married couples have of picking a place to eat? Hopefully.

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

afarrell commented on Men charged by U.S. with laundering more than $1B in cryptocurrency   washingtonpost.com/nation... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
splix · 2 years ago
Curious, what do you think about breaking the laws of authoritarian countries to save people's lives? Do you think people should be allowed to do that or not?
afarrell · 2 years ago
“Allowed” by whom?

The police employed by authoritarian countries? Yes, though I don’t think corrupt officials should take bribes.

The judges employed by those countries who recognize necessity as an excuse for what is otherwise a crime? Yes, though now the law seems less authoritarian.

INTERPOL? Depends on the law.

———————————-

How does this relate to the topic a hand?

u/undergrowth54

KarmaCake day9952July 15, 2010View Original