Readit NewsDNS filters might be very easy to set up but if they become more major they can be outsmarted very easily - what if Google starts serving ads from www.google.com, would you block that domain name too? Browser extensions can block content far more precisely.
And smart TVs and such stuff could easily switch resolvers and just not use your Pihole's DNS resolver - that would work even without DoH as long as you don't intercept traffic on your router. E.g. Fire TV already adds Google DNS as an additional DNS server (you can't change that). Chromecast only uses Google DNS (AFAIK you can't change that either). I guess the only viable option here is just not to buy those products.
I fail to see the privacy implications. I’m already giving someone my passport details – I must do that to enter or exit the country. That passport already contains my photograph. What privacy am I losing by having my photograph taken at the airport?
I say this as a very privacy-conscious individual. I block ads, don’t use Facebook, etc. I fail to see the further loss of privacy in this case, over and above the mandatory scanning of my passport.
It seems to me that the only way to resist is to take a very hard rejection of facial recognition entirely in any situation.
No they don't. I've been in a car with a front window defroster and a rear one. The icons are different, but who knows which is which.
> Not everyone understands "Fuel"
More than understand an inscrutable icon. Besides, anyone can look up Fuel in a dictionary. How do you look up an icon?
> "Włącz", "Rozmrażanie", "Paliwo"?
Dictionaries are marvelous tools. translate.google.com works great, too. There are no icon dictionaries, especially when everyone copyrights them so every icon is different. If you don't know what the icon means, you're borked.
Hey, I'd settle for the wretched icon if underneath it they're write "Defrost".
Besides, I've traveled in Poland. I don't know a word of Polish, but had a wonderful time regardless. Everyone I met was very nice.