https://www.nps.gov/subjects/policy/upload/NPS_Guidance_Memo...
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/policy/upload/NPS_Guidance_Memo...
You might be thinking of Vivaldi. Brave is certainly buggy, but it's not written in Javascript.
I get the people arguing for free speech (in general) as there are lots of upsides.
Where are the upsides in CSAM - whether real or computer generated? How does it benefit society?
In a public forum like X, there probably are no upsides.
In general, though, pedophilia exists. This isn't something that is going to change. What is the harm in providing them with a alternative to real CSAM (which actually and actively hurts children)?
Backups of course would have helped.
Can you explain why? Why can't both a and b point at the same string object? Does `let b = a;` do something like a destructive move?
error[E0382]: borrow of moved value: `a`
--> main.rs:4:16
|
2 | let a = String::from("hello");
| - move occurs because `a` has type `String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
3 | let b = a;
| - value moved here
4 | println!("{a}"); // Works! Prints: hello
| ^ value borrowed here after move
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::format_args_nl` which comes from the expansion of the macro `println` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
3 | let b = a.clone();
| ++++++++I get that you're making a Windows joke, but this describes Linux equally well.
It also proves that Waymo's capabilities are overstated. I keep getting pushback when I complain about specific situations in this forum about how Waymo thinks about complex situations - and this entire time, it may have been humans navigating them.
Try to not let clickbait headlines shape your view of a situation.