Readit News logoReadit News
transfire commented on Abstraction, not syntax   ruudvanasseldonk.com/2025... · Posted by u/unripe_syntax
transfire · 2 months ago
FOR loops?

YAML has a merge key <<:, which might be helpful.

The merge key is a clever little trick, but it depends of the special hash key, so lists can’t be merged.

Syntax does matter, which is why YAML matters — even if imperfect.

transfire commented on UTF-8 is a brilliant design   iamvishnu.com/posts/utf8-... · Posted by u/vishnuharidas
transfire · 3 months ago
So brilliant that we’re all still using ASCII!†

† With an occasional UNICODE flourish.

transfire commented on The day Return became Enter (2023)   aresluna.org/the-day-retu... · Posted by u/sohkamyung
transfire · 4 months ago
I agree. Separate keys would be better.

I wonder if hat word processors would have used a separate Enter (or Go!) for?

transfire commented on UltraRAM scaled for volume production – is now ready for manufacturing   tomshardware.com/pc-compo... · Posted by u/AnnaRiot
transfire · 4 months ago
I hope there are no major problems to commercialization. This will be huge!
transfire commented on Smalltalk, Haskell and Lisp   storytotell.org/smalltalk... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
transfire · 6 months ago
IDK. They all look a little atrocious to me.

But readability has a lot to do with what you are used to.

The only exception might be FORTH. A very well written FORTH implementation (and I mean very well written) probably would be fairly readable to anyone — at least at the higher levels of abstraction.

transfire commented on Show HN: AutoThink – Boosts local LLM performance with adaptive reasoning    · Posted by u/codelion
transfire · 7 months ago
That’s awesome!

Now have it mark blocks of text on or off, so it can ignore irrelevant, or worse erroneous material — no need to include it in the context window.

transfire commented on Ruby 3.5 Feature: Namespace on read   bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues... · Posted by u/ksec
transfire · 7 months ago
Do we really need a new “code container” type for this? Could modules not serve the purpose by localizing require. e.g.

    module Foo
      require “bar”
      …
    end
So everything bar.rb loads in safely within Foo?

transfire commented on The History and Legacy of Visual Basic   retool.com/visual-basic... · Posted by u/ibobev
account-5 · 7 months ago
I feel the same about MS Access databases, for databases obviously. Provided you kept within its limitations, and actually used relational models, it was really quick at setting up a database program. I never used VB6 but the workflow sounds similar.
transfire · 7 months ago
It was almost exactly the same expect in VB you had use some esoteric code to access databases — and they kept changing what was the “proper” way to do it. (I think by the time I quit VB it was ADO?)
transfire commented on Intel to announce plans this week to cut over 20% of staff   scmp.com/tech/big-tech/ar... · Posted by u/KnuthIsGod
transfire · 8 months ago
Is this a reflection of the economy in general or just Intel’s own troubles?

With Apple’s move to Arm and increasing interest in RISCV, the x86 architecture hegemony seems to finally be cracking.

transfire commented on TLS certificate lifetimes will officially reduce to 47 days   digicert.com/blog/tls-cer... · Posted by u/crtasm
brazzy · 8 months ago
Are you seriously not aware of Let's Encrypt? https://letsencrypt.org/

Nobody has really had to pay for certificates for quite a number of years.

What certificates get you, as both a website owner and user, is security against man-in-the-middle attacks, which would otherwise be quite trivial, and which would completely defeat the purpose of using encryption.

transfire · 8 months ago
As long as Let’s Encrypt is still around.

I find it hard to believe there is no way to secure without requiring an authority in the middle.

u/transfire

KarmaCake day1145November 28, 2012
About
The Truth can often hurt, and leads to negative karma in a world that prefers the security of blinders.
View Original