Readit News logoReadit News
towaway15463 commented on My Trip to Space Filled Me with Overwhelming Sadness   variety.com/2022/tv/news/... · Posted by u/signa11
therealdrag0 · 3 years ago
If we domesticate the majority of the planet nothing substantial will evolve without us controlling it. We have replaced a large percentage of wild organic biomass with us and our pets and cattle and farms.
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
We’re still very far off from that and trending away from using more land in developed countries.
towaway15463 commented on My Trip to Space Filled Me with Overwhelming Sadness   variety.com/2022/tv/news/... · Posted by u/signa11
trinsic2 · 3 years ago
I gather that tyrannical forces are something our species will continue to deal with for our evolution.

I'd counter that tyrannical forces actually spurs humanity in the right direction. I say this because I have notice over the years that our species have been dealing with this problem since the birth of mankind. This is an observation, not a plug for tyranny.

towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Tyranny generally results in stagnation. It’s a bottleneck. All the power and decisions reduced to a single individual or group of individuals leaves no room for experimentation and growth. Progress becomes single threaded instead of parallel.
towaway15463 commented on My Trip to Space Filled Me with Overwhelming Sadness   variety.com/2022/tv/news/... · Posted by u/signa11
PaulDavisThe1st · 3 years ago
That's technically wrong. Evolution is possible via expansion into new biomes, or by being able to use/exploit as-yet unmetabolized compounds, or through shifting inter-species relationships (e.g. entering (or leaving) symbiosis).
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Technically it’s possible in any environment except those that kill 100% of the population. Whatever survives, survives and reproduces.
towaway15463 commented on My Trip to Space Filled Me with Overwhelming Sadness   variety.com/2022/tv/news/... · Posted by u/signa11
pohl · 3 years ago
Sure, there's no life without death, but you're kind of underselling the Anthropocene Mass Extinction a wee bit, aren't you?
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Not really. As sentimental and time limited beings we don’t want to see things go extinct since we won’t be able to experience them again or be around to see what comes next. But in the larger picture we’re actually quite tame when it comes to extinction events. At least we are making an effort to limit the damage we’re doing. Space rocks and chemistry can’t do that. In the long run other species will evolve and maybe with luck we’ll have a hand in steering that evolution.
towaway15463 commented on SimulaVR Has Been Subpoenaed by Meta Platforms, Inc   simulavr.com/blog/subpoen... · Posted by u/phiresky
ehnto · 3 years ago
What I was trying to communicate in my original post was that VR is not like those mediums on this specific point. It completely removes you from the environment, it provides a lot more immersion but then also takes a lot more commitment to dive into. It only takes me 30 seconds to get the headset on and be in a game, so that's not the issue, it's just an entirely different level of engagement. I almost feel a little guilty when I use VR, because it feels like I'm forgoing the real world. I don't feel that way about games or movies.
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
That’s odd because I have the opposite feeling. I almost never play regular computer games anymore because I see it as a time sink. I also avoid watching things by myself for the same reason. Playing a VR game or spending time with others in VR feels much more rewarding because I’m using my body instead of sitting in a chair and I feel more engaged with the people I talk to when they are embodied in an avatar and we are present in a space together vs just hearing their voice through headphones.
towaway15463 commented on Computer Saturation and the Productivity Slowdown   libertystreeteconomics.ne... · Posted by u/Bostonian
rTX5CMRXIfFG · 3 years ago
If you want to improve standards of living for more people with respect to the socioeconomic realities of each person, you’re going to end up with an outgoing cash flow towards some welfate policy or humanitarian cause that funds people’s basic needs and healthcare, which won’t count as “growth” in the capitalist sense, which is the sense being used here.
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Wealth transfer isn’t going to improve anyone’s well being. Making a better lifestyle more affordable by increasing productivity will though.
towaway15463 commented on Computer Saturation and the Productivity Slowdown   libertystreeteconomics.ne... · Posted by u/Bostonian
mihaaly · 3 years ago
Slower growth, why is that a problem? That is still a growth.

Are we really expecting not only everlasting growth but exponential growth until the end of times?! Come on! Even the 1.27% growth of the groth seems unsustainable, we should be happy about it it not seeking the faults in not achieving somthing unattainable.

towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Why should there be a limit on human productivity? After all it means we are getting more efficient at the things we are doing, doing more with less, is that not a laudable goal? Any time we have approached a limit we have found a way to cheat it, that’s cause for celebration.
towaway15463 commented on SimulaVR Has Been Subpoenaed by Meta Platforms, Inc   simulavr.com/blog/subpoen... · Posted by u/phiresky
exodust · 3 years ago
> younger folks won't see this distinction as pronounced

But they will see it as pronounced because it is pronounced, for all the reasons mentioned.

People love real spaces, real objects, real venues, smells, and atmosphere. The physical characteristics of friends and strangers, from subtle facial cues to outrageous clowning around. In VR, all that is stifled or non-existent; substituted with digitally representation, crafted by unknown processes. Cold origins. Black boxes.

> enter VR experiences en masse

Really? I wouldn't bet on it. The warmth of remote communication you mentioned, is coming from that which we already have. Phones, screens, coffee next to the laptop, simple face to face chats on the screen of your choice. Show me your new house! Cool, walk around carrying phone. Not a VR headset!

Strapping on a headset and embracing rendered distractions while you communicate? I don't see that happening en masse. You'd need to literally get real before VR takes off. Each headset commanding a tiny 360 drone camera, flying wherever you like without incident. See you at Burning Man! From your couch. In this impossible "RR" (remote reality?) future, a typical music festival or live event would have both real people and a bunch of VR drones - somehow inter-mingling, silent without collision, without any issues. Until then, VR is a device strapped to your head, dishing out pre-renders. Your real cat limits the VR experience, and into the bottom drawer goes your headset, right next to the DJI drone you got for Xmas.

towaway15463 · 3 years ago
This sounds like an argument against TV or movies or the internet. Those things are also substitutes for real life experiences and yet people still spend huge amounts of time with them. VR doesn’t have to preclude the rest of the world. It’s an addition to it. When you don’t have the money or the time or the energy to go out it’s nice to be able to jump into something like VR and have fun with others from the comfort of your home.
towaway15463 commented on SimulaVR Has Been Subpoenaed by Meta Platforms, Inc   simulavr.com/blog/subpoen... · Posted by u/phiresky
Eisenstein · 3 years ago
I love VR, but it is terrible for things like watching movies. Imagine sitting on your couch and putting on a movie. How often do you do that? If it is more often than 'once in a while', are you actually sitting and watching it intently the entire timee? Are you eating, or drinking anything, or petting your cat or dog, or snuggling on the couch with your SO or kids? You can't do that with a VR headset on because you can't see anything else at all. If you grab for a glass you have to switch to pass-through mode and back again, or take off the headset. You also can't do anything but look at the screen.

It isn't really something that people want to do.

Exceptions of course would be to do it with someone remotely, like a friend or a family member -- it is a good way to potentially 'hang out' with people who aren't physically there. But the same caveats apply.

towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Well, I do watch movies with others in VR on a fairly regular basis and it’s great. Could be better, headsets need to be more comfortable and pass through has room for improvement but both of those things are on the very near horizon.

Look at the cambria demos, they’re already doing mixed reality by blending the room with the experience. No reason that can’t be used to put your couch, coffee table and SO in the virtual theatre. You also have to consider that a lot of the younger people using these won’t have dogs or kids to worry about.

towaway15463 commented on Facebook reportedly laying off thousands of employees   futurism.com/the-byte/fac... · Posted by u/cromat3
randomsearch · 3 years ago
The timing is too early and the product and the company are mismatched.
towaway15463 · 3 years ago
Both the other commenters make good points. Meta is uniquely positioned to build the first metaverse. It may not be the only metaverse and it may not come out on top in the end but it will likely prove a lot of the technology and patterns that will continue to be used. That’s why I don’t think they’re mismatched, you might be right about them being too early. They’ll have to build a lot of it themselves and try to stay competitive in the market at the same time. Difficult, but other companies have done this. They’re off to a good start as well since their hardware currently dominates the market.

u/towaway15463

KarmaCake day417April 27, 2022View Original