Dead Comment
WhatsApp is absurdly unsafe to use, but so are SMS/MMS and unpatched web browsers for various reasons. There is also no good way to segregate them, meaning that their compromise is a compromise of the entire device. Even GrapheneOS is now unsafe because it hasn't received patches for months. The only logical conclusion is that both Google and Meta are in on it. Something tells me that these vulnerabilities are why the government gives both companies a free pass.
Even if these doors were closed, there is also the cell tower communication chip that has significant access to the phone, and risks device compromise. All together, using a smartphone is more unsafe than using Adobe Flash back in the day, but nothing is done about it.
The article contains this:
#replace eth0 with the interface open to the internet (e.g might be wlan0 if wifi)
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
However, I use mullvad and the .conf files that they provide contains none of this, and works just fine. It contains just: interface, private key, address, dns and peer public key, allowed ips, entrypoint.So, which one is right and why?
Meta getting free books to train an LLM, piracy bad
Individuals getting a pass, good.
See, it just depends on how you slice the Venn diagram. With a bit of imagination you'll be able to start connecting the dots by yourself in no time.
In fact I fail to see any connection between those two facts other than that both are decisions to allow or not allow something to happen by OpenAI.
Dead Comment