Readit NewsSo yeah, you can tag it.. if you exit your current app, find Omnivore in your launcher, open the app, find the entry you just made, then edit it, then add tags.. but that's a terrible UX.
I noticed development had stopped weeks ago. Sort of figured something like this was going to happen. Unfortunate, but I'll be happy on Wallabag again. I'd been just waiting for a push to do migrate back.
It's just not documented well.
He talked about subtitling at some point, and I was surprised how cheap subtitling services are. I think he went beyond the price he mentioned, but it really made me question why big, profitable YouTube channels aren't spending the small change to do at least native language subtitles that Google can translate, instead of relying on YouTube's terrible algorithm
That said, Whisper seems to generate quite good subtitles that take short pauses for timing into account, but they're obviously neve going to be as good as a human that actually understands the context of what's being said.
This problem is not exclusively at the feet of Arizonans nor retirees.. with a population of 40 million in Cali (and 1/4 of the state being desert) vs 7 million in Arizona, I daresay Californians are spending more of this limited resources on golf courses and manicured lawns, which regardless of how opulent and wasteful it feels, these aren't even the main issue. 80% of all the water in the Colorado river goes to farmland (and I do mean all, 100% of the water is being diverted before it reaches the ocean and has been for some time). Much of it for water-intensive crops such as alfalfa, not to mention producing 90% of the nation's winter vegetables in California.
All of that is to say, if we're going to point fingers, let's not stop at lawns in one particular state. And before we dismiss possible solutions out of hand, we should probably do an assessment of whether or not a proposal to help the issue is economical, practical, and scalable (cultural relevance is just a nice bonus). Bear in mind, the federal government has successfully argued that the treaties do not require them to assess the needs of tribal peoples nor build the infrastructure to meet that need and the supreme court has formally ruled that the Navajo will not got water access under the attempted legal push. California, Nevada, and Arizona all lobbied the court in support of this "no" ruling (I'm assuming amicus briefs, but reporting doesn't specify). Hopefully further political and legal efforts can grant the Navajo nation this basic human right, but in the mean time, it is worth looking into stop-gap solutions for the 40,000 Navajo on reservations who don't have access to drinking water.
1: https://www.npr.org/2023/03/20/1164852475/supreme-court-nava...
2: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/05/arizona-wate...