Gab has an absolute right under the first amendment to be able to speak most of the time without government intervention.
ftfy. Speech is not unlimited. Freedom of speech only applies regarding government censorship.
Look at the debate around making Internet access a right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Internet_access
Same debate around free healthcare et al, which last time I checked somebody had to provide.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/righttod...
goes well beyond breaking up big tech though, needs an entire reversal of culture at this point
...at the expense of things they are not experts in. Ask an expert in virology how to prevent spread of the virus and they will give you a good answer. But that doesn't mean turning their advice into a mandated policy will work out well. Game theory comes into play there and an expert in virology is likely not an expert in game theory, politics, economics, or anything else involving policies affecting 350M+ people.
To be fair, neither are most politicians.
It doesn't actually need this. The phone app can just ask for permission to access your location, which you would then give it when you call 911 because you want the emergency responders to know where you are.
Anyone who really wants to can already deny the phone their location by using a Faraday cage with a WiFi access point in it so the phone has internet but no GPS or cellular triangulation. You can't prevent it by not allowing the user to deny the permission.
There is no excuse for special permissions.
I'm guessing this is the old joke about Eric Schmidt?