This is simply not true. I'm Swiss and working as a developer and consultant in Switzerland since the nineties. I - as many others - was able to do several studies at a world-class university right on my doorstep without getting into debt. People are fair, hardworking, innovative and responsible. Switzerland has ideal conditions for companies and people looking for work. And it's a great place to live. Why do you think Google and others have large development departments in Switzerland? And it's also good for start-ups. Have a look at e.g. https://www.organisator.ch/die-100-besten-startups-der-schwe... and https://www.top100startups.swiss/index.cfm?page=136340&cfid=....
Also see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Swiss_companies_by_rev....
I won't go into details publicly, but: If your market and your potential acquirers are primarily in the US, and you think your startup will have a long-term focus in the US, avoid incorporating in Zurich. Go to London, Berlin, Paris, pretty much anywhere but Zurich. If you absolutely have to incorporate in Switzerland, move yourself to a startup-friendly Canton such as Zug. Do not incorporate in Zurich, and do not open an office in Zurich.
My experiences have been resoundingly negative, and I am not the only one - founders just avoid talking about the negative experiences for fear of causing more problems.
If your market will be primarily Switzerland and the immediate neighbors, starting here is likely fine (albeit you will get better price/performance on engineering in neighboring countries).
Feel free to reach out in private.
There are kernels written in Rust, such as Redox, but those are separate projects, and that's not what this conference session or article are talking about.
Standing reminder: the Rust project is not a fan of rabid Rust over-evangelism (e.g. "Rewrite It In Rust", "Rust Evangelism Strike Force"), and sees it as damaging and unhelpful. We discourage that kind of thing wherever we see it. We're much more in favor of a measured, cautious approach.
So reading your last paragraph makes me feel welcome as someone that says "Rust is great - but rewriting everything in Rust will not solve security". Thanks. <3
* an explanation how to test the multiple heterogenous out-transitions of a state efficiently,
* the reason for the silent assumption that at most one out-transition of a state is followed, i.e. that this is not an NFA [0],
* most importantly, a comparison with Binary Decision Diagrams [1].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondeterministic_finite_automa...
"At least 10,000 wealthy people left the country to avoid paying the tax; most moved to neighboring Belgium"
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-11-14/france...
So this is actually where the discussion should go: What properties does the Swiss wealth tax have (particularly in the wider taxation system) that the French wealth tax did not have?
What is needed for a wealth tax to have no negative effects? What about income and capital gains tax at the same time? Etc. etc.
I am not trying to make an argument pro wealth taxes, I am trying to make an argument against shallow and non-empirical arguments.
Other features of the tax system more than offset the 0.3% wealth tax.
Personally, I am a bit disappointed by the lack of depth of the discourse: Wealth taxes and their effect have been studied quite a bit in economics literature, and there are various peer-reviewed papers that attempt to measure the effects, but the Silicon Valley crowd is strangely avoidant of examining evidence or explaining their opposition with real-world data. It's all 101ism and polemics.
See also https://twitter.com/halvarflake/status/1295283922117566464?s... - I tried to ask @rabois for the source of a claim, and got crickets in return.
I'd like to see a more nuanced and thorough discussion, to be honest. Perhaps that's a bit much to ask.
But from talking with them, it seems like their focus is on retirement - hopefully in their 50's. That's their grand plan, because that's when they'll start "living".
It's a bit of a contrast to us Scandinavians - as we really like to live in the present. No pie in the sky dreams.
Which is also why we guard our working rights and work-life balance like a national treasure.
My experiences of working both in the US and in Europe (Germany and Switzerland) was that the number of hours worked in the US was higher, but the intensity of work was lower: There was more office chitchat, more goofing around, more "watercooler/coffee talk", and so forth. There is also an extreme culture of "presenteeism" in the US that starts in highschool (where being physically present is much more important than being attentive in any form).
> wage stagnation that set in in the 2000s.
And imagine that. Seems to fit the low wage story pretty well.
Not to be snarky, but you can't do any reading in economics about competitiveness and not encounter the current account balance (which is exports - imports): https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/6701/trade/importance-of-...
So, from a very narrow and short-sighted point of view.. they're just as productive as we are, but they have 1/3 our population and they work fewer hours which limits their ability to compete in the global marketplace.
For German companies that serve only domestically or within the EU, I doubt the councils are a problem or even an impediment.. but for companies that want to operate globally, I imagine it does reduce their ability to compete.
I guess the question for Germany is, do they want to sacrifice these broader protections and slightly better working conditions in order to improve profits for a handful of companies that can actually take advantage of it? I hope not, but it looks like the groundwork is already being laid for a campaign to change this.
If you check https://tradingeconomics.com/germany/exports you can see that Germany exports about EUR 112bn worth of goods per month, on a population of about 83 million, about EUR 1350 per head. For comparison:
Canada exports about 49bn CAD per month, on a population of 38m, for approximately 1297 CAD per head.
The US exports about 208bn USD per month, on a population of 327m, for approximately 638 USD per head.
If anything, the big weakness of the German economy is not that it is not competitive enough, the big weakness of the German economy is a lack of domestic consumption due to not much of the money actually reaching workers pockets; this is a result of a fairly aggressive wage stagnation that set in in the 2000s.