Readit News logoReadit News

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

thegrimmest commented on Meta projected 10% of 2024 revenue came from scams   sherwood.news/tech/meta-p... · Posted by u/donohoe
mrguyorama · a month ago
> It is not possible for Big Tech to exclude scammers

It's 100% possible. It might not be profitable

An app store doesn't have the "The optimum amount of fraud is not zero" problem. Preventing fraudulent apps is not a probability problem, you can actually continuously improve your capability without also blocking "good" apps accidentally.

Meanwhile, apple regularly stymies developers trying to release updates to already working and used by many apps for random things.

And despite that, they let through clear and obvious scams like a "Lastpass" app not made by Lastpass. That's just unacceptable. Anything with a trademark should never be possible to get a scam through. There's no excuse.

thegrimmest · a month ago
> It's 100% possible. It might not be profitable

These are the effectively the same thing. Asking a business to harm its profits is like asking a person to self-harm.

thegrimmest commented on Amazon confirms 14,000 job losses in corporate division   bbc.com/news/articles/c1m... · Posted by u/mosura
martin-t · 2 months ago
It's wild that you can legally work for a company, spend your limited life's time to build a part of it while not owning even a tiny bit of it (getting paid for unit of time - a finite resource) and then just get fired once you are not longer useful and that's the end of your income from the thing you built for you.

All the while people who own it don't have to perform any kind of work and keep getting paid in perpetuity as long as the company exists, even if the amount of time they spent is less than one millionth of the total man-days spent building it.

And they can use that money to buy more properties which generate them more passive income, getting ahead further and further.

thegrimmest · 2 months ago
This is called "consensual exchange" and it is by far the most ethical way to run society. You don't have to agree to these terms. You can go start your own company. It's a free country. The alternative always seems to boil down to various bureaucrats dictating terms to people. What gives them the right to do so?

You're no more entitled to be paid a salary than you are to get laid. Both satisfy needs that you undeniably have, but must be negotiated with other people on a strictly consensual basis.

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

u/thegrimmest

KarmaCake day837July 24, 2012View Original