Fun story: my wife ordered a couple of those "alternate" sets, and none inflicted on Legos patent nor TM (no lego branding, not a copy of a lego set, etc). The Swedish customs acted on their own (baffling to me) and stopped the package, sent her a letter in stark wording to accept forfeit. She challenged this, then Lego's lawyers got in contact with us and, using the figure patent, claimed this was a copy and we should forfeit or they would sue her. Very harsh letter, very stark wording.
Left a very bad taste in my mouth, haven't bought any Lego (or alternatives either) since.
On the other hand, CIX have been putting actual Arm v9 hardware in developers' hands for some time.
https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/modern-appliances...
Such as?
I never ran into such problems with Amazon, but I would like to know the alternatives.
This is what I don't understand. Why is this even being considered by Arm exec team?