Not having a universal-nation-wide identification system only makes it worse for everyone.
Not having a universal-nation-wide identification system only makes it worse for everyone.
The best I can come up with is that Facebook is so big that the "evil" is an emergent property of all the different things that are happening. It's so big no one can comprehend the big picture of it all, so while the individuals involved have good intentions with what they are working on, the sum total of all employees' intentions ends up broken.
So maybe Zuck is telling the truth here, that they are trying to fix all this. But no one can see the forrest from the trees.
I can't reconcile it any other way.
Maybe they are trying, but also maybe they are trying to have their cake and eat it too.
What I mean is that very likely the proper way to fix things would financially hurt FB, which seems it’s something they really don’t want to do.
If you have family in India you can just not block the country and that should be good enough for everyone? Of course my solution that I came up in 5 minutes is probably not the one we'd actually want to implement, but this has been an issue for probably half a century at this point, I'd hope this is enough time to find one decent mitigation implementation.
At the same time that these companies don’t do anything about spam calls, they formed a consortium to push something called A2P-10DLC on services like Twilio, to force smaller businesses to pay more money for the privilege of texting their own customers. They say it’s for protecting the end users from spam, but clearly they don’t really care about that, instead they realized they were not getting a big enough piece of the pie of texting services and want to get more.
Personally, I pretty much never answer calls from unknown numbers, unless I am specifically expecting a call (eg: from a service company coming to the house, or calling back about an inquiry I made).
It's really rare I even get a call from someone in my contact list - even for something "urgent" most people just send a text ("call me - urgent!" is serious). Anything for work is scheduled, and even then it's been years since it was anything but zoom/teams/etc.
Part of this I think is a shift in the way people operate with technology: texting is faster and better than voicemail. Slack, zoom, etc dominate workplaces. Part is it's been ruined by spam.
I don't know if society as a whole is there yet, but I think it's basically rude to expect you can just interrupt someone at any point and demand their direct attention to have a synchronous voice conversation with you. Had the PSTN not existed and you were to try to launch "Telephone" as an app today, it would almost certainly fail. "You get a unique 10 digit number and if anyone types it in, it makes your device ring loudly, 24/7, no matter what else you're doing, and you're instantly placed in a two-way audio call with them!"
My number is in the federal do not call list. I used to manually block every single number from spam calls, but now I gave up.
I’ll just never answer a call unless it’s from a known number and I’m expecting it. Otherwise I’ll just return it later if it’s important enough.
My guess is that phone network operators don’t care because they haven’t figured out a way to make money blocking these calls.
At the same time, the same carriers are going out of their way to block text messages from businesses that legitimately use services like Twilio to communicate with their users/customers. Why? Because the alternative for these businesses is to pay about $3k setup fee + $3k/quarter to get a shortcode for the privilege of texting the carriers customers - the same customers the carriers don’t care about protecting from spam phone calls.
If you mean YC has a strong community of founders who share war stories of how people and companies were difficult to work with, and the other YC founders pay attention to those stories though, well, that's not a blacklist.
About the blacklist, I don’t know exactly how it works, who specifically has access to it or who can add entries to it, but I know it exists, I know people who have been affected by it, know people who have been told explicitly about it and know that at least some partners have access to it.
Let's not pretend this is new: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_blacklist
The difference now is that visibility is more uniformly distributed across the population.
Not sure what will land you there, but I know they have it and use it.
Well, a milder version anyways. Look-up is only country level, not state, and what changes is generally the pop-up rather than the privacy policy. But the tools are already in the marketplace.
When Ford motors started cars already existed, when Facebook started social networks already existed, when Google started search engines already existed, etc.
In my opinion, getting demotivated for not being the first or being “the one” that came up with the idea prevents way too many people from starting their own thing.
In the end, execution and adoption are what really matters. In general is better to copy something and improve on it than trying to invent something completely new.