Readit News logoReadit News
sydbarrett74 commented on Libre – An anonymous social experiment without likes, followers, or ads   libreantisocial.com... · Posted by u/rododecba
jacobobryant · 3 days ago
I've been working on this kind of thing over the past several years (for a while full time as an attempted entrepreneur, now on the side for the past couple years). The latest iteration is https://yakread.com -- hit "take a look around" and you can see the "home page"/a list of recommendations without signing up. The recommendations are personalized, i.e. the probability you'll see any particular post depends on your individual interactions with past posts, if you've signed up. (it does collaborative filtering with spark mllib). So that may be a bit different from what you had in mind, since your comment sounds more like an unpersonalized system, but with some extra exploration thrown in. However in practice I suspect the biggest thing the collaborative filtering is doing at Yakread's current scale (not much) is learning which items are good/bad in general.

I also do have some methods baked in for doing exploration. "Epsilon greedy" is a common simple approach where x% of the recommendations are purely random. I do a bit more of a linear thing where I rank all the posts by how many times they've been recommended, then I pick a percentage 0 - 100, then I throw out the top x% most popular (previously recommended) items. that also gives you some flexibility to try out different distributions for the x% variable.

The source is at https://github.com/jacobobryant/yakread

sydbarrett74 · 3 days ago
Interesting project!

I also appreciate being introduced to the digital public infra initiative.

sydbarrett74 commented on How does the US use water?   construction-physics.com/... · Posted by u/juliangamble
close04 · 5 days ago
> Fresh, clean water is astonishingly cheap

Because you can find it in "concentrated" form (think entropy), all in an aquifer or a river, and these are everywhere. But these dry up because of our usage and the climate, and when they do you still have the same amount of water on the planet, it's just not as easily accessible. It's super spread out, it's too far away, it needs a lot of expensive processing to make usable, or all of the above.

What's cheaper and easier for you, to condense a cup of water from the air or to just turn on the faucet?

> we should be using solar and nuclear for everything

Why solar? Energy is not lost/consumed in the universe, so why not collect it from anywhere else. Energy is astonishingly cheap, that's why we use so much of it. If you know what I mean...

sydbarrett74 · 3 days ago
Energy is never lost, however, it’s transduced into less and less useful forms due to entropy.
sydbarrett74 commented on How does the US use water?   construction-physics.com/... · Posted by u/juliangamble
FredPret · 6 days ago
If it's the same molecule but downhill and mixed in with some other ones, it's just x number of joules and y number of dollars' worth of infrastructure away from being among its own kind and uphill from your tap again.

We get blasted with an uncountable number of these joules from above (the sun) and below (nuclear). Our economy is generating an exponentially increasing number of dollars.

I understand wanting to be careful with resources, but not to the point where frugality becomes a goal in and of itself.

sydbarrett74 · 3 days ago
There’s nothing wrong with frugality as an end-goal as long as it’s not coerced.
sydbarrett74 commented on How does the US use water?   construction-physics.com/... · Posted by u/juliangamble
FredPret · 6 days ago
> How much water is wasted on golf courses...

Zero. You can't waste water, it goes in a cycle.

I mean unless you transport it off-planet.

You can waste the energy you spent cleaning it and pumping it around. But between nuclear and solar we ought to have an overabundance of that.

In a market economy, if it becomes "economically infeasible" to purify used water, the price goes up slightly, and suddenly it makes a lot more sense to treat dirty water, or even seawater.

You see the same type of argument against oil or mineral use; the idea that we'll run out. But people who argue we'll run out almost always look at confirmed reserves that are economical to extract right now. When prices rise, this sends a signal to prospectors and miners to go look for more, and it also makes far more reserves economical.

For example, Alberta's oil sands were never counted as oil reserves in bygone decades, because mining it made no sense at the time. But the economy grew per capita and overall, prices rose, and suddenly Canada is an oil-rich nation.

A similar dynamic applies to water and everything else.

Of course there are finite amounts of oil and uranium and so on, but the amounts just on this one planet are absolutely mind-boggling. The Earth has a radius of 6400km, and our deepest mines are 3-4km. We may expect richer mineral deposits (not oil) as we go further down.

Keep following this price logic and at a certain point it'll make sense to mine the far side of the moon, the asteroid belt, and so on ad infinitum.

sydbarrett74 · 3 days ago
True. However, substitution of one good for another, or bringing online another source, won’t be instantaneous and thus otherwise needless human suffering will occur. The raw numbers don’t capture that.
sydbarrett74 commented on 9 Years of "Learning to Code" and I Still Couldn't Build a To-Do App   offpeaklog.bearblog.dev/l... · Posted by u/speckx
m463 · 7 days ago
I look back at the beginning of the PC era, which I hated.

We had modern multi-user and multi-tasking operating systems. We had decent high-level languages.

But the PC era started with DOS, a single-user operating system. And basic, which was so unsophisticated.

But looking back later I realized that the unsophisticated operating system and the unsophisticated language... they let normal people do things. You didn't need to understand semaphores or event-driven programming to make simple single-user programs.

And I kind of see people stuck in this distracting learning environment with too many moving parts, I think back.

sydbarrett74 · 7 days ago
There are projects like NAND2Tetris that IMO successfully capture that ethos. I’m also heartened by the retro movement, which keeps going from strength to strength.
sydbarrett74 commented on The End of Handwriting   wired.com/story/the-end-o... · Posted by u/beardyw
sydbarrett74 · 7 days ago
I actually write more quickly in block print than I do cursive. My left-handedness and the various accommodations I’ve adopted might have something to do with it.
sydbarrett74 commented on Web apps in a single, portable, self-updating, vanilla HTML file   hyperclay.com/... · Posted by u/pil0u
sydbarrett74 · 9 days ago
I'm getting a 404 for most of the pages. Not confidence inspiring.
sydbarrett74 commented on Microsoft is considering a stricter RTO policy   businessinsider.com/micro... · Posted by u/cebert
sydbarrett74 · 22 days ago
Soft layoffs and mass constructive dismissal.
sydbarrett74 commented on Why I left my tech job to work on chronic pain   sailhealth.substack.com/p... · Posted by u/glasscannon
sydbarrett74 · 2 months ago
Thank you for sharing your story, and congrats on your endeavour.
sydbarrett74 commented on Postcard is now open source   contraption.co/postcard-o... · Posted by u/philip1209
sydbarrett74 · 2 months ago
Thank you, philip1209, for sharing your project. Props. :)

u/sydbarrett74

KarmaCake day713July 3, 2020View Original