Readit News logoReadit News
srouhaewaehy commented on A tale of how Google tried to win against Mozilla   twitter.com/johnath/statu... · Posted by u/8x8squares
cm2187 · 6 years ago
If you own Google docs, ensuring it doesn’t break or show an incompatible banner on competing browsers is not an abstract or metric-less concept, it is very tangible and measurable. In fact that’s the sort of thing I would expect any of their engineer to do as part of the development, unless they have been told that releasing a website that only renders on Chrome is OK.
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
The engineer doesn't decide the schedule though. Usually their activity is controlled by having to do X tasks in time(X)-time(Y)=available_time, with Y being any set of reasons, political, financial, organisational that the engineers will accept as true.

Then as engineer what can you do? Either assume toxic Management (and switch Jobs) or do a subset of what you would usually do, and that means optimize for your own browser first and only work on bugs known to your management for the other browsers.

srouhaewaehy commented on Jack Ma Again Endorses Extreme Overtime as Furor Rages On   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/bryanwbh
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
On one side one really needs people working 24/7, on the other I can't get why this would be a requirement. The best development progress is reached when people code for about 30 hours a week.
srouhaewaehy commented on Mutiny at HQ Trivia Fails to Oust CEO   techcrunch.com/2019/04/14... · Posted by u/daniel_iversen
etaerc · 6 years ago
Huh? There's a political battle for CEO in a multi million dollar startup and then the very new CEO dies on a drug overdose and nobody talks about possible murder?
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
Why was this downvoted? At least in the TechCrunch articles that option wasn't even mentioned.
srouhaewaehy commented on Ask HN: What are the best open-access journals for non-academics to submit to?    · Posted by u/freeradical13
p1esk · 6 years ago
Just send your results or ideas to someone knowledgeable about the topic and ask their opinion.
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
This.

If you work in the field you know the 10-100 people who provide most expertise and you can build trust relationships with them by delivering interesting thoughts and then get their feedback on These ideas. That's the healthy approach. And if you work hard and the stuff you do is reasonable you will also become known in these circles.

Also technology can help weed out the complete b.s., see HN or Stackoverflow for examples on that.

srouhaewaehy commented on Ask HN: What are the best open-access journals for non-academics to submit to?    · Posted by u/freeradical13
dijksterhuis · 6 years ago
Publishing to arXiv [1][2] is your best bet in the short term.

- Free

- Lots of subject areas (not just computer sci.)

- People may cite your work

- People may offer feedback

You do need to get endorsed first though [4] (as another comment mentions).

However, if you want "proper" peer reviewed & published, you need to start looking around at conferences. They're usually easier to get something through, as they tend to expect much shorter papers.

There are industry led conferences (like RuhrSec [3] for Cyber Security) which might be a good route to start with.

But, really, there's no shortcut for getting into a "proper" journal / conference. You need to research, have funds, time and, sometimes, a bit of fame already.

[1] https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16832/why-uploa...

[2] https://arxiv.org/help/support/faq#1C

[3] https://www.ruhrsec.de/2019/

[4] https://arxiv.org/help/endorsement

srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
> However, if you want "proper" peer reviewed & published.

So, why would you want "proper" peer review nowadays? It should be a means to achieve something else. Just for the challenge?

I mean besides arXiv there are many ways you can get your knowledge out there if you want to give people free (or even paid) access to it. This will also create a lot of Feedback if it's the least bit interesting.

If you want your knowledge to generate new products and companies you will also find that Startups nowadays don't wait for peer review before they launch.

So the only practical reason I can see is if you want to get funding. And Then you use the funding to create more papers. To… well… get more funding.

TL;DR: If you think about that you want to have "proper" peer review meaybe you should spend some time thinking about what you actually want to achieve and if there aren't better ways to get there.

srouhaewaehy commented on Ask HN: Those who moved careers from the West to China, what's your experience?    · Posted by u/jaxbot
JoelTheSuperior · 6 years ago
If I had to guess, they reduce the censorship during the day to lessen the effect on businesses. In the evening it's primarily going to be people using the internet at home, which they'll want to control more tightly.
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
Also in 9-5 China time most western people are not online. But in the Chinese evening Europe wakes up and then slowly also the US comes online leaking into the Chinese morning.
srouhaewaehy commented on Interviews with developers who became managers   devtomanager.com/... · Posted by u/siddhant
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
The Problem with this Kind of interview is that a lot of These Manager types won't do interviews About their Jobs. So you will only get interviews with ~20% of them who are probably neither at the top nor at the Bottom of the Manager sphere.
srouhaewaehy commented on ‘AWS vs. K8s’ Is the New ‘Windows vs. Linux’   zwischenzugs.com/2019/03/... · Posted by u/puzza007
srouhaewaehy · 6 years ago
Which of the two is Linux? It's more like Windows vs Java.

u/srouhaewaehy

KarmaCake day3March 26, 2019View Original