People flaggig this, but it's obviously meant as satire, and I assume it's meant to be though provoking.
Similarly natured antisemitic comments in the thread weren't flagged, so what was this one?
Readit Newsspoiler commented on AI overviews cause massive drop in search clicks arstechnica.com/ai/2025/0... · Posted by u/jonbaer
Monetizing is fine with me: There’s nothing stopping creators from showing relevant ads—ones they choose themselves. Sometimes I have even found myself wishing there had been an ad a few months ago for a software conference I just realized I missed.
If someone blogs about woodworking, show static ads for tools they actually use and love. If they're into programming, show JetBrains, cloud providers, or anything dev-adjacent. Totally fine by me.
The problem is that almost everyone defaults to Google Ads—which then serves me wildly irrelevant junk, think brain-melting pay-to-win mobile games or even scammy dating sites that have zero connection to the content I’m reading and zero relevance to my interests.
It’s not just noise, it’s actively degrading the experience.
Ah I remember the good-old day when people were selling "ad spaces" on their sites that weren't obtrusive. And usually the ads were things the author approved of or even used
spoiler commented on Memory safety is table stakes usenix.org/publications/l... · Posted by u/comradelion
Oddly I see a lot of marketing for Rust. Not gonna make it a success, sorry. No one cares about Rust lol. It's specialized. It has a value and a place, but it isn't a mainstream thing unfortunately.
What gives you the impression it won't be mainstream at some point? Its adoption seems to be on steady but slow rise.
Also I think there's other great things about Rust other than _just_ memory safety
spoiler commented on Discord.com added to EasyList, the biggest adblock filter list github.com/easylist/easyl... · Posted by u/akyuu
How is it verifiable?
I use Discord daily , but always had some type of paranoia about it. So, I'm low key looking for alternatives (less tech savvy friends will be harder to convince to migrate though).
spoiler commented on Ask HN: What's the best tool you've used for sprint planning in 2025? · Posted by u/jackh04878
I loathe Jira. People should be allowed to have that many fields on a screen, its ridiculous what is allowed. What sets linear apart from it?
I think what sets it apart from Jira is the balance between customisation and opinionated features I mentioned earlier. It will be useful a tool out of the box, but you can progressively enable a few extra features as your team grows.
I know on the surface it sounds a lot like Jira, but the execution is subtly better across the board. A lot of it is design/UX related too.
And lastly, it's very snappy. At previous job I had to wait seconds for between clicks for Jira to update. I don't know how that's considered okay by Atlassian (but I'm not sure if they upsell you "faster Jira" lol)
Another thing that stood out to me was their "Linear Method" posts https://linear.app/method
spoiler commented on Ask HN: What's the best tool you've used for sprint planning in 2025? · Posted by u/jackh04878
Best tool I've used so far in this field has been Linear. It's simple, and a great balance between opinionated and customisable. The UI is simple and snappy too. It's like a polar opposite of Jira.
Deleted Comment
I'm not sure that's true, but even if it is - isn't all of that covered by the first amendment?
It's true. The first amendment gives him the freedom to express his beliefs, but it should be obvious that who endorses terrorism and genocide is going to be suspicious/monitored in case they are further radicalised
spoiler commented on An Interactive Debugger for Rust Trait Errors cel.cs.brown.edu/blog/an-... · Posted by u/matt_d
LOL. People raked C++ over the coals for having metaprogramming sophisticated enough to need debugging. People mocked projects like Templight (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2015-04/slides/EuroLLVM2015Templight...) as just providing how awful C++ is. Now, when the same thing appears for Rust, it's evidence of how awesome Rust is?
I used to write C++ for around 10 years. I get the point you're trying to make... Like, both languages sometimes produce errors so long as to seem unhelpful (although the Rust error in this post is actually immediately helpful, so maybe it was a poor example on their part).
However, comparing Rust traits to template programming seems a bit disingenuous. One is literally a templating engine (albeit powerful one that people got creative with) and the other is part of a fairly cohesive type system (even if it has some downsides).
Also, I think even the most obtuse errors in Rust are still more helpful than average C++ template error.
Usually you fix it by moving your point through a different colour space. Choice depends on your requirements and mediums you're working with (normally different types of light sources or screens).
I had to write a low level colour interpolation librar for a few interactive art projects, so I dipped a bit into this, but I'm no colour expert