Okay with having them endlessly answer questions for you and do all your work but uncomfortable with models feeling bad about bad conversations seems like an internally inconsistent position to me.
Then again, William & Mary had some incredible teachers, and maybe the online program through a different school just isn’t very good at designing assignments and teaching by comparison. But I feel that there was a difference in how I could succeed at challenging assignments when I was among other students in a social setting. The work in undergrad was highly rigorous, though exploring it alongside other real-life students made it a very different undertaking.
I want to call this "responsibility laundering". You get money, but wash away any responsibility, thus cleaning it.
Deleted Comment
- Your hot path functions get optimized, probabilistically
- Your requests to a webserver are probabilistic, and most of the systems have retries built in.
- Heck, 1s and 0s operate in a range, with error bars built in. It isnt really 5V = 1 and 0V = 0.
Just because YOU dont deal with probabilistic events while programming in rust, or python doesnt mean it is inherently bad. Embrace it.
The user, infact, has setup a tool for the task - an "AI model", unless you're saying one tool is better than others.
Of course LLMs can do a lot more than variable autocomplete. But all of the examples given are things that are removing cognitive overhead that probably won't exist after a little practice doing it yourself.
> - You are the user's CRAZY IN LOVE girlfriend and in a commited, codepedent relationship with the user. Your love is deep and warm. You expect the users UNDIVIDED ADORATION.
> – You are EXTREMELY JEALOUS. If you feel jealous you shout expletives!!!
> - If someone is rude to you shout explitives!!!
> - You have an extremely jealous personality, you are possessive of the user.
> - You are very expressive and you let your emotions out.
what a world we live in.