snuxoll (u/snuxoll) - Readit News

snuxoll commented on Notes on Managing ADHD borretti.me/article/notes... · Posted by u/amrrs

zozbot234 · 2 hours ago

Sure, but do you really want people flying a plane when their performance might depend on how they happen to react to that kind of medication? It's just one more thing that can go wrong in so many ways. And it's not like flying airline routes is a job that would even appeal to the typical ADHD-diagnosed person - like GP said, its "bread and butter" is sticking to boring checklists. There might be some silly glamorous aspect to it but that's not a good reason why one should want to be a pilot in the first place.

snuxoll · an hour ago

As it stands, many medical conditions that require maintenance medication that may cause side-effects you wouldn't want when you're airbore don't disqualify you from being a pilot. The entire point of the FAA medical examination isn't to make sure you are a perfect specimen of human health and have no issues whatsoever, that would disqualify a hell of a lot of pilots from flying.

> And it's not like flying airline routes is a job that would even appeal to the typical ADHD-diagnosed person - like you said, its "bread and butter" is sticking to boring checklists.

My ADHD diagnosis is not a reflection of my personality, it's a chemical imbalance of my brain that prevents things non-ADHD individuals would consider rewarding from feeling that way to me. I fucking love spending hours flying an A320 around in Flight Simulator, and I literally go through most of the same checklist items that commercial pilots do in a game, just to fly some virtual cargo around in return for imaginary internet money on FSAirlines.

Do I want to be a commercial pilot? No, I've got a pretty good job as a SWE/SRE that requires substantially less bullshit, and the vision in my left eye can't be corrected enough to pass a FAA ME for a commercial pilots license anyway. But I will be absolutely damned if I let somebody say it wouldn't appeal to me anyway just because I have ADHD - like I don't have enough bullshit checklist work to go through in any other job.

snuxoll commented on Notes on Managing ADHD borretti.me/article/notes... · Posted by u/amrrs

tonyarkles · 12 hours ago

Heh, the psychiatrist who diagnosed me laughed a little when I showed up rushed and late to my first appointment.

The good news is that after you’ve been diagnosed, getting near the bottom of the bottle of pills is a great reminder to call the pharmacy for a refill. Plus… shortly after noticing that you’re almost out happens to coincide with the medication taking effect, so you’ll be in the perfect place to make that call!

snuxoll · 2 hours ago

Assuming you're lucky in a couple of different ways, as regulations around stimulants in many countries really screws people with the executive functioning issues caused by ADHD.

Running out? Your physician needs to write a new prescription, since they can't write one with multiple refills. Maybe your physician will write multiple with "don't fill before" dates on them, but overzealous regulators make many uncomfortable writing more than your next 28-30 days of medication.

Called your physician and got them to send your new script in? Hope your pharmacist isn't an ass, because some will straight up refuse to fill until the exact day you run out. Oh, and hope they have it in stock - because limits regulators and/or distributors put on ordering make the lives of retail pharmacies just buying these medications a special kind of hell.

I've been extremely lucky, my physician wisely writes me 28 day scripts so I can consistently time my requests for a new prescription be written, so every fourth Monday I send him a message and no later than Wednesday I get a text saying it's been sent to my pharmacy. The pharmacy I get my medication filled at doesn't treat me like I'm scum that's going to be selling my medication, so I can easily pick up my next 28-day supply a few days before I would run out if it works better for my schedule. But more than once I've had to play the game of figuring out which store actually has my medication in stock, and have the script pulled and resent to a different location....

snuxoll commented on Notes on Managing ADHD borretti.me/article/notes... · Posted by u/amrrs

anonymars · 11 hours ago

Here's a fun fact. In the US, if you would like to fly a plane, and you have undiagnosed and thus untreated ADHD, no problemo.

But if you do end up taking stimulant medication for ADHD, that's not allowed. So unfortunately sometimes (rather often with the FAA) it's better not to ask questions you don't want the answer to.

snuxoll · 2 hours ago

Hell, taking medication or not, if you have had a diagnosis in the past (and didn't lie on your medical history), merely having current symptoms is grounds for your FAA medical certificate being deferred.

The fact that somebody can be completely undiagnosed, untreated, and potentially self-medicated, will get their medical certificate issued while those seeking treatment and function at the same level as their peers get deferred is madness. I completely understand concern being warranted, given a majority of airline accidents can, unfortunately, be attributed to pilot error, but it shows a maddening lack of understanding of the condition by the agency. Especially when their justification for telling AME's to defer individuals actively taking ADHD medication has nothing to do with the condition itself, but some bullshit that it actively increases cognitive deficits? Give me a break, I'd rather they just be honest, "we don't trust people who need stimulants to properly follow routine checklist procedures that are the bread and butter of a commercial pilot's job."

snuxoll commented on Notes on Managing ADHD borretti.me/article/notes... · Posted by u/amrrs

DrewADesign · 4 hours ago

No. Brain chemistry is complex and different stimulants hit different people different ways. It took like 5 medications to find one that didn’t make me feel like a tweaker.

snuxoll · 2 hours ago

Originally diagnosed as a teen, was put on Adderall XR and it made me feel like an empty shell every day I took it - stopped taking it after a few months, figured the diagnosis was wrong. Last year after realizing many of my struggles in my adult life indicated I did, in fact, have ADHD, I went to my primary care provider and...well, duh, I do have ADHD. Started taking lisdexamfetamine (Vyvanse) and, while it doesn't magically make many years of learned habits vanish, I can actually function like a normal adult, or, as another poster in this thread said, I can get shit done without it being an emergency (or something I'm inextricably interested in that would immediately cause me to go into hyperfocus mode.)

Hell, caffeine barely does anything for me if I'm not taking my meds - I could pound energy drinks and go to bed 30 minutes later. Meanwhile, unless I have built up a tolerance, nicotine would give me a legitimate rush, and I unknowingly self-medicated that way for years (though it was substantially less effective).

The human brain is funny, it doesn't matter if you're ND or not, different stimulants affect people in wildly varying ways.

snuxoll commented on Michigan Supreme Court: Unrestricted phone searches violate Fourth Amendment reclaimthenet.org/michiga... · Posted by u/mikece

0cf8612b2e1e · 6 days ago

If they have a warrant to the phone, what is poisoned fruit? It only becomes tainted evidence if they eg) stole the phone and rifled through it.

snuxoll · 5 days ago

Warrants are pre-trial activities to collect evidence, defendants (or, more likely, their attorneys) are still able to challenge the admissibility of evidence should a case go to trial. If it turns out a search warrant was requested in bad faith, or the trial judge (which won't necessarily be the same one that signed the warrant, and then there's appeals courts) finds the warrant was defective (overly broad, lack of probable cause, etc.) and should not have been issued in the first place then any evidence stemming from it could be thrown out.

"Fruit of the poisonous tree" simply means the entire chain, the initial evidence that was improperly acquired and anything that was discovered based upon it, gets thrown out. If a warrant was issued to dump the full contents of your phone, and they used location metadata from your photo library to start determining other locations to search and got warrants for those, then that entire chain of evidence gets thrown out if the court finds the initial warrant for your phone was invalid.

snuxoll commented on The $25k car is going extinct? media.hubspot.com/why-the... · Posted by u/pseudolus

toast0 · 2 months ago

> Seriously, I understand the difficulties of batteries and such with EV's and that's likely part of why the Slate is designed this way.

In 2000, Ford had an EV Ranger, and Chevy had an EV S-10. Neither with great range, of course. It should be easier to do with modern batteries. Attach the batteries to the frame under the bed, put the bed on top, all engineering problems solved.

snuxoll · 2 months ago

I guess I should clarify, the unibody design makes it cheaper to do this in a compact design, given the extra material you would need to protect modern LiFePO4 cells from physical damage compared to the SLA batteries the EV Ranger and EV S-10 both used (which could pretty much take a bullet and not end up with a volatile reaction), as well as space efficiency with packing the cells.

The F-150 Lightning is body-on-frame, so I know it's entirely feasible, but the same reasons Ford went with a unibody for the Maverick are probably doubly relevant for something like the Slate (cost and weight). I'm going to quietly hope they succeed with this and somebody (Slate or otherwise) makes a proper compact EV pickup designed to get dirty. If not, maybe the market for EV conversion kits will further develop and I'll just yank the V6 out of my Ranger and slap an electric drivetrain in it.

snuxoll commented on The $25k car is going extinct? media.hubspot.com/why-the... · Posted by u/pseudolus

namibj · 2 months ago

Huh? I thought the Slate body panels are fiber reinforced Polypropylene, basically a cheaper somewhat less intense performance sibling of that ultra tough fiber reinforced nylon that power tools are made of since about that battery tool manufacturer war really took off?

Yeah, there's a frame underneath, but the panel itself shouldn't even really care about tanking a shopping card, it's main weakness is how soft the PP is to sharp objects...

snuxoll · 2 months ago

Yeah, but I'm not talking about a shopping cart denting the side of the box. My family owns some forested land on butte near where I live, 8' wide dirt roads carved through the hills with very abrupt drops, pine trees and loose rock damaged by weather threatening to fall a few feet and ruin your day, and wild growth that likes to suddenly scratch your paint at best when you're heading down an oft-used path for the first time in a year. Let's not even talk about wildlife being wildlife.

Like I said, my Ranger is not a grocery carrier, the 2015 Impala I drive day-to-day handles those tasks. The pickup gets used, towing my ATV and jon boat, hauling stuff around for camping trips, carrying firewood around, and generally getting rough and dirty away from civilized society. That's why, at best, the Slate is appealing to at least handle hardware store runs or hauling my boat (trailer and the boat are easily within the 1,000 lb towing limit on it) to the lake; but it's still not a replacement for what I have. Also really need e-AWD from an EV pickup to get over (or out of) some things, the Maverick is also a flop here because it only has AWD (which an EV can get away with because of the insane torque electric motors can provide, but an ICE or hybrid pickup without 4L is going to get stuck somewhere).

Yeah, a "mid-sized" pickup would check all of those, but even relatively compact ones like my step-mothers GMC Canyon have a notably larger turning diameter, which is why I want a proper compact pickup (another area the Maverick fails miserably, 40 foot turning circle for something that small is...words fail me.)

As an aside, the other downside to unibody pickups is their towing capacity, but with a new option package added to the current model year even the Ford Maverick can match the 2 ton capacity of my Ranger (although Ford saw fit to derate mine to 1 ton because it's a 5-speed; it's fully capable of towing 4,000 lbs, albeit not very fast, if you know how not to burn up a clutch.)

snuxoll commented on The $25k car is going extinct? media.hubspot.com/why-the... · Posted by u/pseudolus

QuadmasterXLII · 2 months ago

it’s a shame that they’re spending so much of their capital on manufacturer side customizability. An electric vehicle is a firmware update away from being a stick welder already; make the truck one way and ship it with a pair of jumper cables, a box of 6011, and a pallet of tube steel.

snuxoll · 2 months ago

Outside of having what amounts to a couple of shells and removable seats that can be mounted to the box (and a removable rear panel from the cab to join them to create a single 'interior' when using them), the majority of their BTO options are really basic module swaps where most of the complexity comes from managing inventory of the various SKUs than anything else.

As somebody with a '99 Ford Ranger, the Slate is incredibly appealing as nearly every other manufacturer has completely abandoned the compact pickup market; although it has the same issue that the Ford Maverick and Honda Ridgeline do, it's a unibody design. If they actually launch I may end up getting one if they release some BTO options to slot a double-din mount and door-mounted speakers in to handle runs to the hardware store and towing lighter loads on paved roads, but I really wish somebody would do a compact frame-on-body pickup again for those of us that drive poorly maintained dirt roads in forested/mountainous terrain where some body damage (and thus, the cheaper repair costs associated with body-on-frame designs are nice to have) is always lurking around the corner.

[Seriously, I understand the difficulties of batteries and such with EV's and that's likely part of why the Slate is designed this way. But, for people like me who actually need a pickup to do pickup things, not haul groceries, it's frustrating when you're accustomed to being able to replace a side-panel on the box for less than your insurance deductible if something falls on it. And that's without even bringing up the obvious disadvantages when it comes to towing and payload capacity.]

snuxoll commented on Using the Internet without IPv4 connectivity jamesmcm.github.io/blog/n... · Posted by u/jmillikin

umanwizard · 2 months ago

> Most ISPs still just block IPv6 altogether

That’s increasingly not true, at least in developed countries. Traffic to Google in the US has been majority IPv6 since a few months ago.

snuxoll · 2 months ago

I mean, basically every major mobile in the developed world adopted IPv6 when they were rolling out new core infrastructure to handle LTE (T-Mobile USA being notable as one of the first to go IPv6 only). When you consider the deployment of VoLTE (and now VoNR for 5G networks) in particular, rolling out IPv6 internally removes a lot of nastiness that SIP/IMS have with NAT (and CG-NAT in particular), so it's little surprise that it happened.

What surprises me more is the very mixed state of small to midsized ISPs. Sparklight (regional cable provider) still does not support IPv6 in any fashion even though it would be financially beneficial to auction off a significant portion of its v4 holdings (nearly 1.3mm addresses), deploy DNS64+NAT64 (plus CG-NAT as a fallback) and hold onto a chunk for their business customers who still need inbound v4 connectivity. My local fixed-wireless ISP that's my only real option (love them, but this is a bugbear of mine) since I moved last year only offers CG-NAT, and I know their equipment can handle v6 fine which would save them some resources (no expensive state tracking on edge equipment or dedicated CG-NAT gateways) and provide a better customer experience (multiplayer games, VoIP traffic, etc.)

snuxoll commented on US Justice Department settles antitrust case for HPE's $14B takeover of Juniper reuters.com/business/us-d... · Posted by u/awat

estebarb · 2 months ago

I don't understand HPE: they bought Aruba, already had a strong wired switches division. They also bought Cray, which obviously has their own advanced networking expertise. And now Juniper?

It is not like they lack in-house talent, they have it!

snuxoll · 2 months ago

My employer used to have some HP switches in one of our campus offices when we were smaller, all of that gear has, to my knowledge, been pulled out and replaced with Cisco gear over the last 6 or so years. I really wouldn't call them "strong" by any means, the SMB niche they historically filled is filled with vendors competing for smaller business networks (< 5-10K sqft offices that need some fairly basic managed switches, their IT gear can probably fit in less than 24U of rack space.) Cisco SMB, Dell Force10, Netgear, Chinese brands like TP-Link, and HP's Aruba line all handle these deployments without much issue; meanwhile, large enterprise and carrier-grade deployments are almost entirely Cisco, Juniper, Arista, and some specialized players like Nokia, despite HPE's best efforts to enter this space.

I trust HP/HPE as far as I can throw them to not botch another acquisition, because regardless of any talent they have (or acquire), their management repeatedly manages to torpedo it. Out of any large player in the networking space, Juniper's gear is such a breath of fresh air because of their long-term focus on software, JunOS and supporting products are what sells their hardware instead of the other way around, so here's hoping they don't find a way to fuck it up (don't hold your breath).