Readit NewsThey already have been, when you look at Ukraine assistance by GDP. The US isn't especially generous, just especially rich.
https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/did-immigration-bring-down-inf...
Some regions will probably become dryer (just as some regions will probably become colder), but I doubt you've have a rational basis for a belief that Central America in particular is likely to be one of the regions that will become dryer.
.. but I doubt you've have a rational basis for a belief that Central America in particular is likely to be one of the regions that will become dryer.
Is your belief rationally based?
Some regions will probably become dryer (just as some regions will probably become colder), but I doubt you've have a rational basis for a belief that Central America in particular is likely to be one of the regions that will become dryer.
From NASA: Increased evaporation will result in more frequent and intense storms, but will also contribute to drying over some land areas.
Don't know if Central America in particular will dry out in the long term. Was just using it as an example of the types of migrations that will come from global warming. Please try to understand the overall point and not pedantically nitpick.
Mass migrations can be handled by destroying all the layers of laws that NIMByYs use.
The solution is more trade, more cooperation, not isolation.
New Mexico can’t build desalination plants. Probably a good idea to not allow water intensive crops to be grown there that are exported.
Mass migrations can be handled by destroying all the layers of laws that NIMByYs use.
It’s rational for a country to not have open borders and allow anyone to just come. It’s also rational to not allow more people to come in than what the citizens are comfortable with. It’s going to be much more Darwinian in the future.
India, for instance, isn’t going to be able account 200 million climate refugees from Bangladesh.
people on this site are frequently very interested in compiler optimization, processor and instruction set optimization, faster clocks, pipelining, datapaths, effective utilization of cache, etc. etc. That's what "greed is good" means, greed drives people to try to improve, to get the most out of what they have.
The use of that line in the film was very clever, it had two meanings, but you don't seem to get the subtle one. There is nothing wrong with greed, greed is good.
what there is something wrong with is envy and jealousy; all cultures and ethical traditions recognize that.
Supply side Jesus appreciates you.
greed drives people to try to improve, to get the most out of what they have.
Salk was not good at what he did because of greed. Leonardo was not great becuase of greed and being more greedy would not have made him better.
Greed is not good. All ethical traditions recognize this. Your view is pathetic. The actual Jesus does not appreciate you.