* only facts supporting one point of view are presented
* reading the minds of the subjects of the article
* use of hyperbolic words
* use of emotional appeal
* sources are not identified
* any facts supporting another view are by definiton biased, and should not be presented
* you have the only unbiased objective interpretation of the minds of the subjects
* you don't bias against using words just because they are hyperbolic
* something unbiased would inevitably be boring, so you need emotional appeal to make anyone care about it
* since no sources are unbiased, identifying any of them would inevitably lead to a bias
AI models are getting so good at creating realistic photographs with just some selfies. So why do we need human photgraphers? iPhone photos + AI seems to do the trick for most.
Thhink professional headshots, graduation photos, weddings, family portraits...
The entire photography profession is disrupted.