Readit NewsI’m confused by the clustering step:
> To find the most informative examples, we separately cluster examples labeled clickbait and examples labeled benign, which yields some overlapping clusters
How can you get overlapping clusters if the two sets of labelled examples are disjoint?
scribu commented on Vision Now Available in Llama.cpp github.com/ggml-org/llama... · Posted by u/redman25
This is the most useful documentation I've found so far to help understand how this works: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/tree/master/tools/mtmd...
It’s interesting that they decided to move all of the architecture-specific image-to-embedding preprocessing into a separate library.
Similar to how we ended up with the huggingface/tokenizers library for text-only Tranformers.
Deleted Comment
scribu commented on LLMs can see and hear without any training github.com/facebookresear... · Posted by u/T-A
This seems to be a system to generate better prompts to be fed into a base multimodal model.
Interesting, but title is definitely clickbait.
scribu commented on Sapphire: Rust based package manager for macOS github.com/alexykn/sapphi... · Posted by u/adamnemecek
IIRC the main reason here is that brew path is hardcoded during the build process of packages, which means that you wouldn't be able to use bottles.
I didn't check, but there is a chance that path is also hardcoded in (some) formulae, so even building from the source might not help here.
You could run the build process with chroot or inside Docker, so that the hardcoded paths actually resolve to a designated subdirectory.
scribu commented on Skywork-OR1: new SOTA 32B thinking model with open weight github.com/SkyworkAI/Skyw... · Posted by u/naomiclarkson
From their Notion page:
> Skywork-OR1-32B-Preview delivers the 671B-parameter Deepseek-R1 performance on math tasks (AIME24 and AIME25) and coding tasks (LiveCodeBench).
Impressive, if true: much better performance than the vanilla distills of R1.
Plus it’s a fully open-source release (including data selection and training code).
Seems like the only way to explore differnt outcomes is by editing messages and losing whatever was there before the edit.
Very annoying and I dont understand why they all refuse to implement such a simple feature.