Readit News logoReadit News
schubidubiduba commented on AI is wiping out entry-level tech jobs, leaving graduates stranded   restofworld.org/2025/engi... · Posted by u/cratermoon
techblueberry · a day ago
Not that like I think one should put too much stock in head lines. But "Wiping Out"

seems to translate to a 6.1% unemployment rate and 16.5% underemployment rate?

https://www.finalroundai.com/blog/computer-science-graduates...

schubidubiduba · a day ago
I think the numbers you are arguing with here are for all employees, not just fresh graduates.

Blame the article for using suboptimal numbers, but the "wiping out" part is definitely justified when talking about jobs for graduates

schubidubiduba commented on Devs say Apple still flouting EU's Digital Markets Act six months on   theregister.com/2025/12/1... · Posted by u/paulatreides
charcircuit · a day ago
Give people an inch and they will want a mile. I hope Apple resists these bullies who feel entitled to use all the hardwork Apple put into building their platform.
schubidubiduba · a day ago
You got it the wrong way around: Apple feels entitled to use all the hard work developers put into their apps to bolster their own pockets.
schubidubiduba commented on Devs say Apple still flouting EU's Digital Markets Act six months on   theregister.com/2025/12/1... · Posted by u/paulatreides
wackget · a day ago
You forgot to mention Google's upcoming developer verification push, which will prevent users installing apps - even from third-party sources - if the developers have not verified their identity with Google:

https://developer.android.com/developer-verification

schubidubiduba · a day ago
Google has already backpedaled on that, luckily.

But you are right, insofar that it likely is only a matter of time until Google's walled garden is as walled in as the one of Apple.

schubidubiduba commented on This is not the future   blog.mathieui.net/this-is... · Posted by u/ericdanielski
jjice · a day ago
I really don't like the "everything is political" sentiment. Sure, lots of things are or can be, but whenever I see this idea, it usually comes from people who have a very specific mindset that's leaning further in one direction on a political spectrum and is pushing their ideology.

To clarify, I don't think pushing an ideology you believe in by posting a blog post is a bad thing. That's your right! I just think I have to read posts that feel like they have a very strong message with more caution. Maybe they have a strong message because they have a very good point - that's very possible! But often times, I see people using this as a way to say "if you're not with me, you're against me".

My problem here is that this idea that "everything is political" leaves no room for a middle ground. Is my choice to write some boiler plate code using gen AI truly political? Is it political because of power usage and ongoing investment in gen AI?

All that to say, maybe I'm totally wrong, I don't know. I'm open to an argument against mine, because there's a very good chance I'm missing the point.

schubidubiduba · a day ago
I believe that one point of the author precisely is that there seems to be no room for middle ground left in the tech space:

Resisting the status quo of hostile technology is an endless uphill battle. It requires continous effort, mostly motivated by political or at least ideological reasons.

Not fighting it is not the same as being neutral, because not fighting it supports this status quo. It is the conscious or unconscious surrender to hostile systems, whose very purpose is to lull you into apathy through convenience.

schubidubiduba commented on Thousands of U.S. farmers have Parkinson's. They blame a deadly pesticide   mlive.com/news/2025/12/th... · Posted by u/bikenaga
GuB-42 · 2 days ago
We need some more nuance here.

Companies are not evil, they are profit driven, and they make profit by responding to demand. If people demand evil, they will make evil, if people demand good, they will make good. I think it is too easy to blame them when ultimately, we are the one who support them.

In the case of farming, we want cheap food, and the way to make cheap food is intensive farming, with pesticides and synthetic fertilizers. So, companies make pesticides, farmers use them, and we eat the cheap food. Because we recognize that some checks need to be put in place, we elect governments to regulate all that, and or vote goes to whoever makes the best balance between cheap food, taxes and subsidies, and general health and precautions. This is crucial because cheap food is a matter of survival to some.

So in the end, there are no "baddies", just a system that's not perfect. Also keep in mind that big corporation are made of a lot of people, you may be one of them. I am. Does it make us evil? Maybe a little, but I don't think any more than average, as middle-class, I even tend to think we define the average.

schubidubiduba · 2 days ago
The issue is when companies try to hide their evil, manipulate public opinion, lobby (bribe) lawmakers to disable the democratic process, ...

All of which happens regularly, and especially in this case, as the person you responded to showed.

Don't seek nuance where there is none.

schubidubiduba commented on How I block all online ads   troubled.engineer/posts/n... · Posted by u/StrLght
bluecalm · 10 days ago
I tried using Firefox. I had it as default browser for 2 years but I just keep going back to Chromium. Firefox is slow and crashes/hangs too much in my experience. It was even very slow to open my automatically generated tables for accounting (for simple html but very big files because accounting regulation in my previous country of residence were brain dead). I don't think often published benchmarks tell the whole story there.

Now I am back to Brave and very happy. Almost no ads, super fast, doesn't crash or hang.

schubidubiduba · 9 days ago
I tried using Brave. It weirded me out with the crypto stuff and random popups. Now back to Firefox, on all my devices, without any crashes ever. And it's just as fast as chromium, which I very very rarely use for bad websites that do not work with Firefox.
schubidubiduba commented on X hit with $140M EU fine for breaching content rules   reuters.com/sustainabilit... · Posted by u/pogue
mystraline · 12 days ago
This isn't too much different than the UK OFCOM doing the similar stunts of suing for Sanctioned Suicide and Kiwifarms for websites hosted in the US, and with no foreign stations of business.

I want to make no mistake - I personally think that Kiwifarms is absolutely gross with their harassment campaigns. But it does appear legal, and first amendment speech issue.

SaSu advocates for people who wish to commit suicide, a how-to. Its the final "my body, my choice" that every government wants to take away. So silencing is a thing. But again, 1fa issue.

https://www.techdirt.com/2025/09/05/when-trolls-take-on-tyra...

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/

schubidubiduba · 11 days ago
I don't see the issue tbh. Why should the UK (or the EU) care about US laws likenthe first amendment? Nobody is forcing them to offer their website to Europeans, a simple IP block of UK users would likely be enough to avoid any legal risks for your US website example.
schubidubiduba commented on X hit with $140M EU fine for breaching content rules   reuters.com/sustainabilit... · Posted by u/pogue
iamnothere · 12 days ago
It’s only recently that free speech could result in government-backed NGOs and government-cozy media collaborating to have a private citizen nationally tarred and feathered, fired from their job, and issued death threats within hours of what they thought was a semi-private conversation. This is absolutely a new state of affairs.

In the past, news would travel—but slowly—and minor news about local citizens was not normally considered newsworthy in non-local markets unless it was extremely unusual and entertaining.

schubidubiduba · 11 days ago
You mean how it happened with Charlie Kirk and all the posts about him, that led to people being tarred and feathered and losing their jobs?
schubidubiduba commented on X hit with $140M EU fine for breaching content rules   reuters.com/sustainabilit... · Posted by u/pogue
trothamel · 12 days ago
If you don't have a presence in the EU, then the EU can't require anything of you.
schubidubiduba · 11 days ago
X does have a presence in the EU though, because it wants to make money by selling EU citizens data.
schubidubiduba commented on X hit with $140M EU fine for breaching content rules   reuters.com/sustainabilit... · Posted by u/pogue
wyldberry · 12 days ago
They can, they just need to use the EU equivalent of <app> they want. No one is forcing EU residents to use <app>.
schubidubiduba · 11 days ago
You've got it the wrong way around. No one is forcing X to operate in the EU. If they want to do that, they need to follow EU laws.

u/schubidubiduba

KarmaCake day26October 10, 2025View Original