The letter of the law is what people follow. The spirit, or intent, of the law is what they argue about in court cases.
If the regulation says 49% and a company follows it, who's to say they're exploiting a loophole? They're literally following the law. Until there is a court case and precedent is set.
There may be some other regulations that are avoided by a partial acquisition, but it doesn't bring it wholly outside of the relevant antitrust laws.
And I think your math is off, $0.20 per kWh at 1 kW is is $145 a month. I pay $0.06 per kWh. I've got what, 7 or 8 computers running right now and my electric bill for that and everything else is around $100 a month, at least until I start using AC. I don't think the power usage of something like this would be significant enough for me to even shut it off when I wasn't using it.
Anyway, we'll find out, just ordered the motherboard.
Sorry if it seems not empathic enough, that was not my intention. I know that the use of such drugs may be medically necessary.
Edit: To serious answers: I was wrong, I stay corrected.
As long as the demand curve is downward sloping, there will be some pass through of Apple's cut to customers, though the fraction that is passed through will depend on price elasticity.
Regarding polars, would you have time to answer these questions?
1) How are polars supported by popular data science packages, e.g., for plotting?
2) I know it is a bit silly: is there a way to get around typing `pl.col`, etc. all the time?
3) Besides `tidypolars`, are there any reasonable packages that add support for dplyr-style pipes or operation chaining?