Readit News logoReadit News
readittwice commented on The complete sequence of a human Y chromosome   nature.com/articles/s4158... · Posted by u/birriel
renewiltord · 3 years ago
So I have my whole genome sequenced by Nebula. What do I have to do to match it up?
readittwice · 3 years ago
Can someone explain how "I have my whole genome sequenced by Nebula" relates to the news just now that "The human Y chromosome has been completely sequenced"?

How can someone have their whole (!) genome sequenced already when so far we weren't able to fully sequence the Y chromosome. And this person seems to have a Y chromosome.

readittwice commented on CRISPR cancer trial success paves the way for personalized treatments   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/dsign
dm319 · 3 years ago
I'm a haematologist who is involved with patients who have CAR-T (I don't do it myself, but do other types of transplant and I look after the patients before and after) and my research area is in the way T cells target cancer.

This study isn't CAR-T. It is more similar to adoptive TIL therapy because it is using the T cell receptor (TCR) to target the cancer's mutations. This has a huge advantage over CAR-T.

At the moment we use CAR-T to target, mostly, B cell cancers. These cancers have CD19 and CD20 on their cell surface, as do most B cells. We can safely target these cells because it turns out your B cells aren't critical for life. Think of it like an amputation. Your B cells went rogue, you wipe them out.

The problem is this doesn't translate to other cancers, which don't have an obvious cell protein you can target specific to a group of cells you can do without.

All cancer cells have mutations, and all cells in the human body have to display a sample of its proteins on its cell surface. This way our immune system regularly identifies cancer and removes it. Cancers that get established have somehow leveraged local immunosuppression to hold off the immune system, and so the immune system and cancer become a stalemate, or worse the cancer takes off and kills the person.

If we can target the mutations of the cancer, then we can get at the heart of the cancer itself.

You might ask why the cancer just doesn't display it's antigens on the surface. If a cell does this it gets removed by NK cells (natural killers) - our body's fail safe.

What I find interesting is that I didn't think we were close to predicting what TCRs can bind to to a peptide on MHC on the cell surface. I'm going to need to look at the article to findout how they did this. I suspect they used a library of known TCR-antigen interactions.

readittwice · 3 years ago
Since there are people here that seem to know a bit about this stuff, I will take the chance to ask some naive questions ;)

Do I have this right that CAR T-cells have this engineered B-cell/antibody like receptor that recognizes antigens only on the cell membrane. While the regular T-cell receptor can look into cells as well? And that's why the T-cell receptor is potentially better at recognizing solid cancers?

So cancers usually create this immunosuppresive environment, wouldn't this stop this engineered T-cells as well?

readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
gebruikersnaam · 5 years ago
Your article from may doesn't say anything about signing contracts, only that they are ready to go.

I've seen the articles mention may, june and august as signing dates of the contract, so clearly there is some 'miscommunication'. And both the may and june date originates from AZ, while the actual date turns out to be august.

readittwice · 5 years ago
There are plenty of articles from May 2020 that all discuss in various words that a deal was struck. If you believe that AZ didn't sign a contract with the UK before Aug 28 then the burden is on you to prove that.
readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
gebruikersnaam · 5 years ago
If they are actually selling at cost [citation needed], why would they ship to Australia with undoubtedly higher transport costs?
readittwice · 5 years ago
It is well known that AZ sells the vaccine at cost. E.g. "... is being offered by the drugmaker at cost during the pandemic and at no profit in perpetuity for low-income countries." [1] That's because the vaccine was developed by the Oxford university and Oxford made this a condition. If AZ makes a profit from the vaccine during the pandemic they would break the contract with Oxford.

It seems the cost price differs from country to country because of different production costs and other factors (maybe shipping).

[1] https://www.politico.eu/article/astrazeneca-vaccine-cost-hig...

readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
hef19898 · 5 years ago
The German chancellor is elected the same way. There is nothing preventing a candidate change after the election, plus there is no way to tell which coalition will actually form. And still almost nobody would argue that the German federal government isn't democratically legitimized.
readittwice · 5 years ago
The president could prevent that though and could ask for a re-election in case of a candidate change after the election. So not nothing ;)

Almost no one would argue that because AFAIK that never happened. Pretty sure people would argue that way as soon as this happens.

readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
gebruikersnaam · 5 years ago
Your link doesn't say anything about signing contracts.

And press releases saying they are ready to go don't count as signing contracts.

All your links are rooted in AZ press releases, which means nothing.

readittwice · 5 years ago
That article was clearly published in May 2020, I don't assume AZ sneaked that article in. Are you really saying that AZ was faking the press release in May 2020, so that in 2021 they could claim that the UK signed the contract three months before the EU?
readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
gebruikersnaam · 5 years ago
"He also denied suggestions that AstraZeneca might be selling vaccine doses manufactured in the EU to other parts of the world in order to make a bigger profit."
readittwice · 5 years ago
IMHO that sentence doesn't prove your point that "The link also says they wouldn't export EU manufactured vaccines".

AZ is selling at cost, so they are not making a profit from the vaccine atm. So that statement should be trivially true.

readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
pvitz · 5 years ago
Selmayr hasn't been the Secretary-General of COM for two years.
readittwice · 5 years ago
Oh right, that's true. Sorry. He is now still a European civil servant though. In my defense, I quickly googled his name and that's what popped out first. On TV was announced as "spokesperson of the European Commission", so I thought that was his official job title.
readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
gebruikersnaam · 5 years ago
Again: Soriot is lying. This link says the UK signed in june : https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-inno...

Except it didn't, the UK signed in august.

The link also says they wouldn't export EU manufactured vaccines, except Italy blocked an export to Australia a couple of weeks ago.

readittwice · 5 years ago
No, I've already posted the article that states that the UK signed the contract with AZ in May. There are also other news articles from May 2020 (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/18/coronavirus-astrazeneca-aims...) that prove that the UK already ordered back then.

That's why it was considered "news" when it was reported that one particular contract was signed by the UK one day after the EU. But that's not the full story, since the UK had binding contracts with AZ well before that.

"The link also says they wouldn't export EU manufactured vaccines, except Italy blocked an export to Australia a couple of weeks ago." I haven't seen that claim in the article you linked.

readittwice commented on EU vaccine rollout severely lags behind   statista.com/chart/24471/... · Posted by u/undefined1
mr_aks · 5 years ago
The EU actually signed a contract with AstraZeneca on August 27, a day earlier than the UK: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/17/europe/uk-astrazeneca-vac....
readittwice · 5 years ago
Again, this is simply not true. Yes, the UK signed one particular contract on Aug 28, so one day after the EU with AZ. However, the UK had a binding contract with AZ since May.

"However, the key lies in an earlier agreement that AstraZeneca made back in May with the U.K., which was a binding deal establishing “the development of a dedicated supply chain for the U.K.,” an AstraZeneca spokesperson said."

Quote is from this article: https://www.politico.eu/article/the-key-differences-between-...

u/readittwice

KarmaCake day531September 3, 2016View Original